Live data from Hacker News

Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

nature.com

291–300 of 358 posts

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#291
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

See, this is an exercise in deliberate confusion. If someone said I was female, of course I would contradict them if it was warranted. My male characteristics are objectively verifiable, up to and including having sired children rather than having given birth to them. My identity has nothing to do with any of this. And for most people, “man” and “male” are synonyms. This is why people always express confusion about w…

> Identity is irrelevant to reproductive role, and sex is about reproduction, and gender is about sex. Every part of this is wrong. First, let's look at sex. You've said sex is tied to reproduction (as an aside, this feels a bit cruel to all the infertile people out there) but that's wrong. https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html > Humans are born with 46 chromosomes in 23 pairs. The X and Y chromosomes de…

You managed to state “every part of this is wrong” without refuting anything I wrote, and in many cases confirming what I wrote with your citations.

1. “Sex is about reproduction”

WHO page: “ When a Y chromosome is present, early embryonic testes develop around the 10th week of pregnancy. In the absence of both a Y chromosome and the influence of a testis-determining factor (TDF), ovaries develop.”

These are reproductive organs.

Each detailed description of chromosomal variations references “sterility,” “infertility,” or “fertile.”

2. “Gender is about sex.”

> You've then said that gender is tied to sex, but that's only true in some countries at this point in history, and it mostly stems from Christian colonialists imposing their view (often using violence to do so) across the world.

This is an absurd claim and appears to imply that pre-colonization, people could not figure out which individuals would bear children and which would sire them based on their physical characteristics, and sort them accordingly. Hammurabi’s code had bride prices, Aztec women were not permitted be soldiers, Chinese women were taught the three followings 2500 years ago. Your statement is simply profoundly absurd. All societies — even the ones listed in your citations — especially the ones listed in your citations — have been capable of distinguishing sex, and setting up different rules of behavior that depend on sex. That is gender.

3. “You've said that identity is irrelevant to reproductive role. That's wrong, which is why there are trans-fathers who give birth.”

This is again deliberate confusion. No matter what pronoun or title you afford this trans man, his reproductive role was to bear a child and not to sire one. Only female mammals produce eggs and only female mammals bear young.

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#292
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since "gender dysphoria" hasn't been scientifically defined yet, you're free to make up a definition so that everyone has it ;)

https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gender-dysphori...

"Gender dysphoria - as a general descriptive term refers to an individual’s discontent with the assigned gender."

That is a very weak definition, if you ask me.

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#293
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gender-dysphori...

"Gender dysphoria - as a general descriptive term refers to an individual’s discontent with the assigned gender." That is a very weak definition, if you ask me.

Didn't ask you

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#294
post #8

Are there leading candidate hypotheses for the cause of autism? Do we know things like heritability, correlation with environmental pollutants, anything?

In psychology how we define a thing is constructed from a series of observable characteristics. The problem is, there are multiple situations that can cause the same series of characteristics. "Are there leading candidate hypotheses for the cause of autism?" is like asking, "Are there leading candidate hypotheses for the cause of a headache?" There is no single cause. What we do know is most people with autism do not…

> Studies have shown eye training on infants can completely remove symptoms of autism.

Do you have any links for these studies? I’ve never heard any credible claims of a treatment for (or prevention of) autism.

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#295

I presume this is a consequence of the datasets they had to work off but it is really frustrating that they have one catchall "transgender and gender-diverse" category, segmenting by birth sex or particular gender identified with would be interesting/valuable

I realize this might be rude but I'm not sure what the polite way to ask is, isn't your sex always your birth sex for the most part? Outside the effects of the medications and the cosmetic effects of the surgery isn't your body still mostly the same as far as the nuts, bolts, and genetic disorders, are concerned?

when it comes to this topic, "sex" "gender" "male" "female" "man" "woman" etc etc are overloaded with contradictory meanings by people trying to make sneaky ontological arguments. unless I'm specifically talking about the signifier itself, I don't really care about these kinds of games, so I just try to say unambiguous things

anyway aside from language legerdemain, the word "sex" is also used to refer to what sex you're legally designated as, which is only loosely coupled to biology by now

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#296
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Have you heard of Abigail Shrier's book "The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters"? She was on Joe Rogan's podcast recently though I have yet to listen to it. A quick search turned up, not surprisingly, some negative critiques and others that are more positive. So, you're asking an honest question, but it's pretty insensitive and I hope you're curious because this is the truth. Framing that as a curious questio…

It never says that the crazy describes all trans people. It doesn't call all trans fakes. You seem to even admit you didn't make it past the title with your uncharitable read, so how do you expect to respond to something it actually claims? It points out that there are some social contagion factors to some expressions in our youth. Which is completely reasonable given how much clout gives you in modern social media,…

Hi, are you here for a curious conversation? Please review the guidelines, because you're cross-examining and attacking the weakest interpretation of what I've said.

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

I specifically referenced the title of the book, because it should be a dead giveaway that the book isn't a great start for this conversation. Nowhere did I say that I only looked at the title, that's your weakening interpretation. I read about a dozen reviews, pro and con, and I'm quite familiar with the literature and science on the subject of trans people.

> It never says that the crazy describes all trans people. It doesn't call all trans fakes.

Sorry, did you even read what I wrote? I didn't say anything about "all trans people". I said that the book is cherrypicking. I'm not denying that those cases exist, I'm saying that those cases are rare.

> You basically dismiss everyone in the book as just being unable to "cope with loss"

Who are you responding to??? I didn't say anything about that.

> Your experience in the 90s has little bearing on 2020 where you get instant social proof on social media in some circles by putting a rainbow flag in your username.

Oh hey, an actual reference to something that I wrote! I'll respond to that. I specifically noted my experience in the 90s, because my transition was delayed 'til the 2010s. I specifically explained why we're seeing a massive increase in the rate of people coming out. But you missed it, because you're focused on attacking the weakest interpretation of what I said.

> That you give yourself so much authority on trans matters, especially in response to such a reasonable point, is kind of an example of what I see as modern trans clout these days.

Yeah, I've got so much "clout". People in my industry are happy to give plaudits for my "bravery", but multiple previous co-authors have ghosted me. Co-workers don't take me seriously like they used to. So professionally, I experience tokenization and isolation. I've lost family, I've lost friends, but if I had a twitter account I'm sure I'd get some followers. But some of my trans friends do get extra followers for being trans -- many of them chasers and trans antagonists who are variously bent on making their lives hell. Whoop di fucking doo. I'd strongly prefer to not be trans, but that's not a choice I've got.

Am I an authority on trans matters? Well, I am a member of the community and I see the good the bad and the ugly -- both from within, and from without. I'm also in regular contact with high-school age trans kids through group counselling -- I don't share their experiences because that would violate their confidentiality.

So what's your basis for authority? All I see is your experiences with amphetamines and you may have read a book about trans people that was written by a blatant transphobe. And you're imploring me to have an open mind. Guffaw.

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#297

I presume this is a consequence of the datasets they had to work off but it is really frustrating that they have one catchall "transgender and gender-diverse" category, segmenting by birth sex or particular gender identified with would be interesting/valuable

I realize this might be rude but I'm not sure what the polite way to ask is, isn't your sex always your birth sex for the most part? Outside the effects of the medications and the cosmetic effects of the surgery isn't your body still mostly the same as far as the nuts, bolts, and genetic disorders, are concerned?

The terms "gender" and "sex" are defined differently by different people, but in general the definition is something like this: Sex is usually defined in terms of genitalia, genotype (chromosomes) or similar biological properties. However, this is still not a binary male/female property, see for example intersex people. Depending on your definition, undergoing surgery may change your sex, gender, or both.

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#298

One other correlation I have seen is "intelligence" trans person. It's very weird how many absurdly smart people happen to be trans. It plays into the idea that mental illness correlates with IQ.

Do you have any source on that? It sounds like it might be just anecdotal due to the fact that trans people tend to be more noticeable.

previous poster's claim is a common piece of folk wisdom that ultimately stems from this paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16298429/ 2005, n=187. the authors are blanchardites so the language they use is needlessly confusing, but they find 107.3 mean iq among the male-attracted trans women, 121.7 among the female-attracted

interestingly while pulling this up I also found this one from 1967(!) https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2... n=34, which found half in the 110-119 range and eight over 140

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#299

Can someone answer my genuine question on this topic? At my high school in California I knew a trans girl (m to f used she/her) that was super chill and maybe a bit on the spectrum. At the same time there were a couple dozen girls that called themselves trans and asked everyone to use they/them but acted and dressed all 100% within female stereotypes (not that trans is about stereotypes I’m just illustrating my point…

this has been a contentious argument for at least half a decade that I've seen, and I won't rehash it here, but the magic words to google if you want to read more are "truscum" and "theyfab"

Re: Elevated rates of autism in transgender and gender-diverse individuals

#300
post #223
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First off: yes, trans tends to be an umbrella term these days. >how are people who still live their cis-lives, happy and don't really plan anything medical trans? Or is trans today just a catch-all phrase for everything a little androgynous? If I understand correctly, you're misinterpreting this graf: >When I go to (back when travel was a thing) places that are less friendly than the coasts and people see the trans f…

So I got that after someone here talked about being nearly trans, because he had no stereotypical feelings? Shouldn't that be normal that your mood changes and you like different things on different days and in different stages of your life? I somehow find it very strange that now people are trying to box "normal" (as in that's how our system is supposed to work) behavior into "trans" - what's the purpose of that? I'…

It's not really about the traits, though. You're making a category error if you think this is about gender stereotypes at root. It's possible that some people transition mostly because of gender roles, but for a lot of us it's because our bodies feel wrong on a fundamental level. It's hard to explain exactly what this means but suffice it to say it's unpleasant enough that it makes transition worth it for a lot of trans people.

I would say that if you find all of this strange that's a good sign that you're probably not trans and nothing more. You're right that transition is not something that just anyone does, there is an enormous amount of self-sorting that goes on.

Also, there's nothing wrong with transitioning and getting psychological help. In fact, I recommend it. Psychologists and psychiatrists these days really shouldn't be anti-transition or anti-trans people existing, the consensus on these things has shifted quite a bit, just like it did back in the 60s and 70s with gay people.

>EDIT: isn't something completely broken if some people binarize traits as female and male and accordingly everyone in between as non-binary? I mean, before we categorized people into genders by sex, now we categorize people into gender by their binarized behavior

Trans people are likely to be the last people to automatically characterize people based on those traits. To me at least, really what matters is what you tell me your gender is. I think people should have the freedom to choose the gendered existence they most desire, in body and in character. Trans women are definitely not all stereotypically feminine, though this is widely believed. I wear a t-shirt and jeans and have a buzzcut.

>Btw: if there's 1 of 100 trans, how come you really know a lot of them? I imagine if they are in the closet, it's hard to get them talking about these things as well! So how do you do it?

The internet :). 1/100 is quite a bit in a world with 7 billion people in it. And more and more of us aren't in the closet anymore. Moreover, closeted trans people often want to talk to trans people who aren't closeted, or have transitioned, because they're looking for validation that what they know to be true about themselves is possible and legitimate and many cultural and societal forces tell them it isn't.

I also suspect the real prevalence of trans people and gender dysphoria is not well understood. I don't know whether the real number is lower or higher, though.

Post reply on HN