eBay is not same-same, it's much more marketplace-esque. eBay does not use a consolidated product listing, much more like a bulletin board each sellers products being sold under it's own URL. Amazon consolidates the listing for all sellers into a single product and uses their own ranking algorithms to determine which seller is in the "buy box" (which accounts for 97% of the items sales velocity). Amazon treats the en…
> eBay does not use a consolidated product listing, much more like a bulletin board each sellers products being sold under it's own URL. Try searching for a product on ebay right now and it's the exact same experience as Amazon. Both Amazon and Ebay's algorithms determine which usb drives show up first when searching for "usb stick", which is where 99% of their commerce is coming from.
Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
51–60 of 386 posts
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#52[1] https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/07/08/53...
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#53Common sense. Amazon want to ‘own’ the customer relationship and go to great lengths to that end then it follows they will have to ‘own’ any liability too. Imagine you went into a retail store with a faulty product and they were to try fob you off saying you need to go to their supplier/wholesaler/manufacturer. It mostly doesn’t work that way thanks to most consumer protection laws in place.
More specifically, the responsibility for chasing down the manufacturer for a refund is shifted onto the retailer, not the consumer.
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#54Long-term, it would be good business sense for Amazon to address the counterfeit issue to remove the bad actors from their platform to stay in good standing with consumers so people continue to use their platform and purchase items without worry about getting scammed. Short-term, at least one idea to fix this is to implement more stringent checks/QA with their FBA policies. Do more stringent verification of imported…
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#55Long-term, it would be good business sense for Amazon to address the counterfeit issue to remove the bad actors from their platform to stay in good standing with consumers so people continue to use their platform and purchase items without worry about getting scammed. Short-term, at least one idea to fix this is to implement more stringent checks/QA with their FBA policies. Do more stringent verification of imported…
How can I know for sure though? How does Amazon know for sure? Since that experience I have looked at Amazon in a different light, and I've realized how difficult it is to source name brand products with confidence.
This is as good a time for blockchain as any. Register genuine products on a blockchain and have them scanned once they hit the Amazon warehouse to ensure they are authentic.
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#56Amazon has been trying to play a parallel game for a while - from one side, they are a brand name store, with their own brands (Amazon Basics), they own loyalty club (Prime), and so on - they even own physical stores and a grocery chain now. On the other hand, they pretend to be a neutral marketplace that has no responsibility for any goods that are sold there and just renting out the space to independent sellers. It…
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably depends on what you are buying. I am a board gamer and counterfeit board games from Amazon is a huge problem. I stopped purchasing board games from Amazon after getting three counterfeits in a row.
How do you tell a board game is counterfeit?
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#58In what world does this not just become a contractually required insurance policy covering Amazon, paid for by the third party. Granted, whoever pays in name, the cost will be passed on to consumers.
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#59Long-term, it would be good business sense for Amazon to address the counterfeit issue to remove the bad actors from their platform to stay in good standing with consumers so people continue to use their platform and purchase items without worry about getting scammed. Short-term, at least one idea to fix this is to implement more stringent checks/QA with their FBA policies. Do more stringent verification of imported…
Short term, it would be a good idea to fine Amazon $1,000,000 a day until the problem is fixed.
There's no way Bezos doesn't know how to fix this, he's a smart guy.
Re: Amazon Liable for Defective Third-Party Products Rules CA Appellate Court
#60Have no idea how they are so dominant still when they seem to not care at all about these things.