fddasf
sdsda
Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
801–810 of 887 posts
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#802Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#803I work at Uber outside of the rides/eats business and observed many feature releases to adjust the business after AB5. What I saw released: - Enabling drivers to see where a rider is going before accepting the trip [0] [2] - Removed a main penalty for declining rides, “No More 85% Acceptance Rate Requirement For Uber Pro” [2] - Drivers get set their own fare with a multiplier [1] (the article details screenshots and…
Not having this was a feature for Uber's customers when they were still in Southeast Asia.
Grab (Uber's competitor, mainly in Asia) allowed drivers to see their proposed destinations, and the experience just wasn't as good.
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#804Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of drivers were sure forced to drive for Uber for lack of other alternatives but that is not Uber's problem. They did not add to the problem. Society failed there. This law helps no one and is a clear example of no skin in the game virtue signalling trumping common sense. I think this is a good point and is correct. But if society has failed the drivers, shouldn't new regulation be the solution?
If the new regulation targets the root of the problem - which is lack of economic opportunities - then yes. Regulation targeting patchwork solution, then it's the definition of virtual signaling.
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#805Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or Uber doesn't tell you the whole story of what you're actually going to make after gas, maintenance, repairs and insurance. There is a reason that 60% of their drivers leave after 6 months. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/uber-statistics/ More likely people don't find out the true costs of being an Uber driver until they wear out their cars, and have to start paying for repairs and maintenance. When your car is…
> Or Uber doesn't tell you the whole story of what you're actually going to make after gas, maintenance, repairs and insurance. It's mainly this. I did a deep dive on Doordash during the pandemic/lockdown while I was going back to school for Supply Chain and Logistics as I wanted to take a better look at how it worked. I even did a few dashes myself. And the people I spoke to, including the owners of the resteraunts,…
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#806Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's clear to me that Prong B of AB5 is broken and it's not fixable, except by arbitrary exemptions galore. Rather than admitting this, the state seems hellbent on shoehorning this law into something politically motivated against gig companies. All the actions on the state's part points to bad faith.
Or maybe the state is acting in good faith on behalf of gig workers, and it's the gig companies tying themselves into knots trying to avoid legislation who are acting in bad faith?
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#807Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe the state is acting in good faith on behalf of gig workers, and it's the gig companies tying themselves into knots trying to avoid legislation who are acting in bad faith?
No, that's delusional. The state is at most interested in recouping revenue because it's out of money due to Covid. There are proposals on the table that would realistically improve the environment around gig work, but the state doesn't appear to care about those.
Also, the legal wrangling over this started long before Covid.
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#808Earlier quoted context omitted.
AB5 imposes an ABC test on businesses after the precedent set by Dynamex [1]. The specific point of contention the judge has is the B of the ABC - that is whether drivers 'perform work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business'. Uber argues it is a technology company first, and drives/delivers second, whereas the judge argues the opposite. Convincing arguments can be made for both sides. The mo…
Taken to its furthest extent, AB5 makes Airbnb hosts Airbnb employees, Amazon marketplace sellers Amazon employees, eBay sellers eBay employees, Twitch streamers Twitch employees, etc. Airbnb: no, because hosts aren't being paid for providing services, they're being paid for providing access to their accommodations. Its a subtle distinction but one that matters legally since it means there isn't a compensation-for-wo…
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#809Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're applying double standards here. If Expedia is not an airline, then Uber and Lyft aren't taxi companies. Uber and Lyft buy the services of independent drivers and resells them to customers. If the ultimate commercial relationship is between you and the hotel or airline when you book through Expedia, then it's just as fair to say that the ultimate commercial relationship is between the passenger and Uber/Lyft dr…
> If the ultimate commercial relationship is between you and the hotel or airline when you book through Expedia, then it's just as fair to say that the ultimate commercial relationship is between the passenger and Uber/Lyft driver. When I book a flight through Expedia I enter a contract of carriage with the airline, not Expedia. This is a contractural matter, not just an abstract concept of "commercial relationship."
Re: Uber CEO says its service will probably shut down temporarily in California
#810Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A lot of drivers were sure forced to drive for Uber for lack of other alternatives but that is not Uber's problem. They did not add to the problem. Uber ignored local laws to force their way into the taxi market without having to compete on the same terms as existing businesses. Uber also classified their drivers as contractors to avoid having to pay fair wages and provide benefits. They've been criticized for this…
So Uber driver’s are too dumb to realize they’re being paid unfair wages? Why would anyone work for such a company if they have better alternatives?
I think you've answered your own question here.