> "Recognizing that the old model where everything was free has consequences, means we must explore a range of different business opportunities and alternate value exchanges," Baker said. > We must learn and expand different ways to support ourselves and build a business that isn't what we see today. Perhaps I am wrong, but to me this reads as Mozilla plans to give up on not being evil and to do whatever it takes to…
Charging money doesn't necessarily mean they're going to start being evil. In fact, they may be able to provide better and more secure products, if it means they can stop relying on Google/advertising/etc. to stay afloat.
Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
231–240 of 1001 posts
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#232250 people, roughly 25% of the company, were laid off today. This is on top of the 70 laid off in January (discussion of that at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22057737 )
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#233I feel for everyone who will lose their job here. That's never a pleasant thing, particularly so in current circumstances. Notwithstanding that though - and with no disrespect to anyone being laid off - I'm actually really encouraged by this. The key quote from the announcement is this one: "Furthermore, Mozilla's contract with Google to include Google as the default search provider inside Firefox is set to expire la…
The last few years, imo, they have been chasing market share by trying to play follow the leader with Google which have turned off a few major power users which was their core base
This is with out getting into some of the political based initiatives we have seen over the last few years as well
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#234That’s not focusing.
“[We] need to go beyond the browser to give people new products and technologies that both excite them and represent their interests.”
What? Mozilla needs to build great products that solve people’s problems better than Google or whomever else does. That’s what Firefox did when it came out. It was objectively better than IE in ways that people could immediately grasp.
“Representing interests?” WTF are you even taking about? If you mean privacy and ownership of my personal data than say that.
“To start, that means products that mitigate harms or address the kinds of the problems that people face today. Over the longer run, our goal is to build new experiences that people love and want, that have better values and better characteristics inside those products.”
Mitigate harms? Again, WTF are we even talking about? Better values? Maybe this is the open source roots showing? But the majority of your business is based on selling default search engine rights to one of the most invasive harvesters of personal info, so let’s not pull that “values” thread too much here Mozilla.
Make awesome products and solve people problems better than your competitors. If you competition is doing scummy stuff, then tell people why your approach is better. Apple is doing an awesome job messaging the importance of privacy.
Come on Mozilla. Get in the damn game
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#235Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
How much are you willing to pay for a browser?
Let's turn that around: How much would it cost to run a lean-and-mean Mozilla that just focuses on FireFox? How much does it cost to run an unfocused Mozilla that tries very hard to compete with all those huge platforms out there? It's the latter company that I would not be willing to pay for, the former would have my cash, and more than they would likely expect from one single user. That's because I think that cedin…
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it is a losing strategy because this is a rearguard action. There are only losing strategies, nothing will turn Mozilla around to be some kind of powerhouse besides what it already is. And that's fine . It doesn't need to be the next singing, dancing platform with bells and whistles. It's a tool. It should do one thing and do that one thing well. FireFox is not a failing product, it is the only product they have…
Your two claims (Mozilla can't do anything other than Firefox, Firefox is not failing) are easy to provide counter-evidence to. You're making strong statements here as fact that are not only subjective but which run against evidence.
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
To do that now would be financial suicide. They have several new services, if they manage to get revenue from them they could survive cutting Google. But not before.
I present to you the Debian Foundation as a counter example. I posit they are surviving just fine without a contract with Google.
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would pay $100 or $5/month or something for Firefox. I don't really understand why they don't have a pay-if-you-want model. I donate to nonprofit news organizations I read even though I can get their news for free, and I pay for a couple Android apps I want to support even though the "premium" versions don't have any meaningful extra features. I'm sure they wouldn't get enough revenue to replace Google's support, b…
They do take donations: https://donate.mozilla.org/
If you want your funds to go toward MoCo (and thus Firefox development), your best bet is to subscribe to Mozilla VPN or Pocket Premium.
Re: Mozilla lays off 250 employees while it refocuses on commercial products
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Work on the bloody browser, forget about the rest. But they did that, and now Firefox market share is almost negligible because it wasn't the default browser on mobile OS's. For example, I'm sceptical about the potential reach of XR, but if it grows big, it is vital that Firefox plays a bigger role there, instead of everybody being reliant on apps and Chrome once again.
> But they did that, and now Firefox market share is almost negligible because it wasn't the default browser on mobile OS's. Firefox has never been a default browser on any OS, mobile or otherwise, and I don't see how that could ever change short of Firefox developing their own OS. Which is in fact something they tried a while back for mobile, and it didn't go so well.
A fork of it (KaiOS) is currently more popular than iOS in India.
I'd argue that their PWA-focused OS was just a few years ahead of its time.