I recently switched from iPhone to an Android and I am definitely less willing to pay for apps. To me its all about the pricing. Going through a list of apps on the first page of the android market I see prices of: $8.05, $7.99, $2.89, $0.99, $9.99, $14.26, $5.99, $2.99. A random selection from the iTunes app store: $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $0.99, $4.99, $2.99. To me, and I'm sure that…
MLB.com CEO: iOS users more likely to purchase content than Android users
61–63 of 63 posts
Re: MLB.com CEO: iOS users more likely to purchase content than Android users
#62MLB.tv is the only subscription service (that I'm aware of) that charges for the app as well. And they do it inconsistently. I paid I think $120-$130, somewhere in that range, for MLB.tv, however I need to pay an additional $15 to get it on my Android phone and an additional $15 to get it on my iPad. However on Roku I pay no additional cost for the app, and on the web I pay no additional cost. I bought the iPad app b…
This is exactly my issue with the At Bat app. I already pay for MLB.tv which plays video in Flash and I have a flash capable Android phone. I don't understand why I should have to pay extra for the app just to watch video. However, last time I checked I was blocked from watching content on my phone.
Re: MLB.com CEO: iOS users more likely to purchase content than Android users
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shazam has a five song limit? I'm never upgrading. When did they do that?
I know they've had a five song limit since the iPhone 4 came out. I had the original version, which had unlimited tagging, but when I upgraded to the iPhone 4, I had to re-download the same Shazam app I had installed on my 3G. The same version, the one they said would have unlimited tagging, implemented the 5 song restriction. There was an outcry from iPhone 3g/3gs users who were forced to upgrade and hit with this l…