Live data from Hacker News

US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

asia.nikkei.com

721–730 of 1001 posts

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#721
post #682

The entire western world should treat China exactly the same way China treats them. Western companies have a difficult time operating in China, but Chinese companies have zero problems operating in western countries. It’s completely unfair and if we follow this to conclusion, the future will be one of only Chinese international corporations. Would WeChat or TikTok even exist if the Chinese market were open to existin…

so china won is what you're saying? their system is superior if the west has to switch to it

Yes. Once US starts playing China’s game, China has won.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#722
post #682

The entire western world should treat China exactly the same way China treats them. Western companies have a difficult time operating in China, but Chinese companies have zero problems operating in western countries. It’s completely unfair and if we follow this to conclusion, the future will be one of only Chinese international corporations. Would WeChat or TikTok even exist if the Chinese market were open to existin…

[flagged]

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#723
post #682

The entire western world should treat China exactly the same way China treats them. Western companies have a difficult time operating in China, but Chinese companies have zero problems operating in western countries. It’s completely unfair and if we follow this to conclusion, the future will be one of only Chinese international corporations. Would WeChat or TikTok even exist if the Chinese market were open to existin…

All this is leading me to have a stronger belief in Nassim Taleb's "The Most Intolerant Wins" theory[1]. Though, in this case there is no minority as such. China was intolerant to the US's ideology and exploited its openness for its own benefit. Now, unfortunately, it has come to a point where even US has to be intolerant like China to be able to get back at it. Thoughts? [1] https://nassimtaleb.org/2016/08/intoleran…

A related idea:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

'The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance."'

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#724
post #682

The entire western world should treat China exactly the same way China treats them. Western companies have a difficult time operating in China, but Chinese companies have zero problems operating in western countries. It’s completely unfair and if we follow this to conclusion, the future will be one of only Chinese international corporations. Would WeChat or TikTok even exist if the Chinese market were open to existin…

so china won is what you're saying? their system is superior if the west has to switch to it

Might is right, in many short-term scenarios.

We don't have to agree that "kidnapping and imprisonment is good", to conclude that some people need arresting and imprisonment.

China is intentionally playing the rules duplicitously, and so the West is going to have to play hardball.

The opening up to China was based on the belief that we would treat each other as equals.

That has not happened and Xi has made clear that will not happen.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#725
post #717
post #704

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They haven’t directly done that, but what they have done is force American companies to form joint ventures with a Chinese company in order to operate in China. This requires the American company to hand over intellectual property and trade secrets. And then, amazingly, some state funded competitor comes along doing the same thing the American company wants to do. Would a Chinese company have this same problem enteri…

No one is forcing companies to do joint ventures. These companies have the option to refuse and not operate in China. Are countries not allowed to impose restrictions on foreign companies?

What is being proposed here is to treat China, and Chinese companies, the exact same way as American companies are treated in China. So, yes, countries are free to have whatever restrictions they want. But we, the western world, must not allow China to abuse our open markets while shielding their markets.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#726
post #694

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We should outright ban any goods or technology that originates in China If we were to start that ban many of Walmart's non-grocery (and some groceries) shelves would be empty for considerable time. I'm unsure there even are alternatives that can meet US demand for everything China provides.

> If we were to start that ban many of Walmart's non-grocery (and some groceries) shelves would be empty for considerable time. I always point out the price difference for the two models of the Purism Librem 5 phone. One model is manufactured traditionally and costs $749. The other model is manufactured in the USA and costs $1999. Americans talk about bringing manufacturing back to the country, but I'm not sure anyon…

if china closes, we can move manufacturing to other 3rd world countries. It's not just China or US. that's a false dichotomy.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#727
post #723

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All this is leading me to have a stronger belief in Nassim Taleb's "The Most Intolerant Wins" theory[1]. Though, in this case there is no minority as such. China was intolerant to the US's ideology and exploited its openness for its own benefit. Now, unfortunately, it has come to a point where even US has to be intolerant like China to be able to get back at it. Thoughts? [1] https://nassimtaleb.org/2016/08/intoleran…

A related idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance 'The paradox of tolerance states that if a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Karl Popper described it as the seemingly paradoxical idea that, "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance."'

Yes, Popper was the original on this thinking. Not Taleb. This is where the phrase "freedom requires we be intolerant of the intolerant"

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#728
post #717
post #704

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They haven’t directly done that, but what they have done is force American companies to form joint ventures with a Chinese company in order to operate in China. This requires the American company to hand over intellectual property and trade secrets. And then, amazingly, some state funded competitor comes along doing the same thing the American company wants to do. Would a Chinese company have this same problem enteri…

No one is forcing companies to do joint ventures. These companies have the option to refuse and not operate in China. Are countries not allowed to impose restrictions on foreign companies?

And these Chinese companies have the option of refusing to operate in the rest of the world.

It sounds like you don't have a problem.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#729
post #693
post #682

The entire western world should treat China exactly the same way China treats them. Western companies have a difficult time operating in China, but Chinese companies have zero problems operating in western countries. It’s completely unfair and if we follow this to conclusion, the future will be one of only Chinese international corporations. Would WeChat or TikTok even exist if the Chinese market were open to existin…

China has not forcefully seized foreign company's promising assets so good so it's impossible to consider for sale, by both a measly 'offer' of maybe 1/10, or less, of the market value and threatening from the leader, has it?

That's exactly what happened with Alipay.
Post reply on HN