Live data from Hacker News

US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

asia.nikkei.com

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#211

What is his motivation for this right now? Is it just the distraction of the week or was there a specific incident recently that triggered this?

One factor is that China has had a Firewall blocking all foreign digital competitors and information sources for a long time.

That's exactly the opposite of a specific recent incident. :)

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A good clue is how vague your question is. Should bytedance and tencent be banned because of "ip theft" by "some companies?" no

Bytedance and Tencent are partially owned by CCP. They are not innocent bystanders here.

Is that all it takes to get you on board with a ban?

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like...China?

Well China does have a valid reason to outlaw Google et. al, because they publicly siphon your data and are not shy about it. Also if you're gonna downvote, provide a reason and counter-point. This isn't reddit and the downvote button is not for "I don't like this".

> Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.

> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.

From the guidelines

Downvoting because you disagree has also been acceptable on this site, since basically forever https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=117171

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#214
post #3

So does this ban transactions with all of Tencent or just those in relation to WeChat? https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-or... Section 1. (a) The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law: any transaction that is related to WeChat by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction…

And what's a "transaction"?

Micro transactions in Tencent’s games? Who knows.

Tencent owns 40% of Epic Games, which owns Fortnite and the Epic Games store. This might be a symbolic move more then anything, because unless they intend to be rigorous about Tencent’s connections with all these companies (e.g Can’t buy anything on Epic’s store, or make micro transactions in games from companies owned by Tencent), they really are not stopping anything.

Your purchases through Epic or Riot (League of Legends, Valorant) are not seen as ‘direct’ transactions with Tencent.

Basically it’s exactly the kind of grandstanding Trump would partake in.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#216
post #196
post #15

An important note that nobody seems to be reporting on: this is only possible because Apple and Google have control over which apps are permitted on your device. The US government has no legal authority to ban publishing (including apps) in the US. They do, however, have the ability to regulate trade between the operators of the App Store (Apple) and the Play Store (Google), and app publishers, which is what they're…

That isn't my impression of how the web works. The second your bits leave your LAN, they begin traveling over infrastructure that is owned and operated by another private entity. They could rescind your access at any time, especially if the government orders it so.

Eh, TikTok could set up some proxies on non-China non-US controlled shared infrastructure, and with modern https the US network carriers wouldn't be able to tell if the traffic was to them or someone else. The degree in invasiveness needed to enforce this policy via ISPs (prohibiting effective encryption) would probably end up violating the first amendment.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, by mirroring China’s authoritarianism and restricting the freedom of Americans. I’m living overseas and now my government is telling me I can’t use WeChat? Telling me who I can and cannot trade with, etc. Restrictions on trade with China are attacks on our freedom.

It is absolutely within the purview of a Sovereign Nation to decide, within the confines of relevant statutes, what companies are allowed to operate within its borders. Trade restrictions are absolutely normal, and are well inline with established practices. What are economic sanctions, after all, but a restriction on the freedom to conduct commerce?

What is the trade reason why these apps are being banned?

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#218
post #213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well China does have a valid reason to outlaw Google et. al, because they publicly siphon your data and are not shy about it. Also if you're gonna downvote, provide a reason and counter-point. This isn't reddit and the downvote button is not for "I don't like this".

> Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading. > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills. From the guidelines Downvoting because you disagree has also been acceptable on this site, since basically forever https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=117171

[flagged]

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#219

What is his motivation for this right now? Is it just the distraction of the week or was there a specific incident recently that triggered this?

One factor is that China has had a Firewall blocking all foreign digital competitors and information sources for a long time.

That don't abide by Chinese law. There's a reason Bing and Skype are still allowed in China. The US government has no proof of TikTok or WeChat violating any US laws that other American companies haven't.

Re: US to ban transactions with ByteDance and WeChat in 45 days

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks, where is the official source?

https://twitter.com/SamAugustDean/status/1291576813685108736 - There's been no official clarification, but an on-the-record confirmation from the WH via a LA Times reporter.

What they say to the press and what the EO order say are two different things.
Post reply on HN