> So Salman Khan also didn't kill any poor in 2002? Some ghosts were driving his car that night?
What has this got to do with Modi? This is the biggest problem with you liberals. You can't debate on facts. The moment you are presented with facts you either shoot and scoot or indulge in diversions. Shows what shaky grounds you stand on!
As far as Salman Khan is concerned I believe he was driving and killed poor in 2002. Now this is my belief. It hasn't been proved in any Court and I am not fighting a case against him nor I have the urge. It is for the victims to take it to the logical conclusion and they are doing it. He was exonerated of charges in a High Court. It can always be appealed in the Supreme Court. I don't have any particular hatred for him, like you do for Modi, to pursue that case. I base my belief in circumstances surrounding the incident. I might be wrong too. That is why it is my "belief" and not a "fact".
But I will never turn my belief into a fact and try to assert to others that my belief is a fact. That if you don't agree with me you are an "asshole" and a "Salman Bhakt". Do you realize how stupid and ridiculous it sounds? You are trying to pass on your beliefs about Modi as facts and then getting riled up because someone called you out! It is borderline juvenile behavior. If this troubles you so much why don't you go to some Court and prove your allegations? Do some hard work for once?
> Can't believe there are ahole Modi bhakts here on HN.
You can call me an asshole as much as you want but you are just exposing your own self. You haven't proved anything against Modi. In any Court of Law. Neither when Congress was in power nor now. This is all you people are good at: calling sane people "bhakts" and "assholes". But when it comes to actually walking the talk you guys hide in some closet!