Live data from Hacker News

Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

thisisgoingtobebig.com

41–50 of 76 posts

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#41
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, by "not the same 9-5 lifestyle," what do you mean? I would hesitate to put words in your mouth, but please tell me the startup lifestyle you have in mind, and whether it is of equal quality. I'm going to give you a handicap, though: You cannot use the concept of "doing something you love," because you cannot require that your employees love it as much as you, or you'll find nobody at all.

I mean self-starting, self-organizing out of the box thinkers that can deal with the chaos of an early stage start-up. My experience is that a lot of agency people have a lot of problems coping in environments without a lot of process, nor are they inclined to feel ownership. There is no sense of equal quality when comparing the lifestyle of a startup to that of working at an agency (of which I have 10+ years experie…

yeah! agencies are the other source of stupid 'web developers', and there are a LOT of agencies in New York being the ad capital and what not.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#42
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, by "not the same 9-5 lifestyle," what do you mean? I would hesitate to put words in your mouth, but please tell me the startup lifestyle you have in mind, and whether it is of equal quality. I'm going to give you a handicap, though: You cannot use the concept of "doing something you love," because you cannot require that your employees love it as much as you, or you'll find nobody at all.

I mean self-starting, self-organizing out of the box thinkers that can deal with the chaos of an early stage start-up. My experience is that a lot of agency people have a lot of problems coping in environments without a lot of process, nor are they inclined to feel ownership. There is no sense of equal quality when comparing the lifestyle of a startup to that of working at an agency (of which I have 10+ years experie…

I've worked in such environments, and as much as I enjoyed the work when I was able to do it, the reality was that we wound up wasting a lot of time spinning our wheels because we accidentally stepped on each other toes. As a result, I wasn't able to do the work I wanted to do, and was hired to do, most of the time that I was there. So the affection wore off, and I gave up and left once I saw the writing on the wall.

I've also worked in companies of 3-4 people (including me) that had basic processes (source control, requirements management, etc), and the results were FAR better. We ended up spending MORE time doing our job, not less. We also spent a LOT less time cleaning up messes and wondering why we acquired 15 build errors every time we synced the code from source control.

Though I agree that a small group doesn't require a lot of process, chaos is counter productive.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#44
post #6

Frankly, it's almost impossible to find good engineers in NYC. The banks do take them all, that doesn't mean that it's impossible to start up in the city, it is just harder. On the west coasts, startups compete with other startups and employees bounce around making similar amounts of money. In New York, startups compete with financial institutions which can and do throw enormous amounts of cash at employees without a…

I wonder if the banking thing isn't as much of a problem as it seems. I work as a financial recruiter, and one of the patterns I see is an on/off relationship with startups and banks, e.g. working two years at Goldman, then one year at a new search engine, then a year at Credit Suisse, then three years starting up a new wiki-based whatsit. If you know you can quit and -- within a few months -- be earning a great livi…

It seems similar in london, I went to the london techcrunch meetup a few weeks ago and quite a few of the people there were ex-banking.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#45
post #3

You know I was cleaning this weekend and apparently I missed the start of "Put the smack-down on PG" week. Any way I can catch up by Friday? Suggestions PG? I have a tentative work entitled "Why PG is wrong about the color of the HN menubar," but I'm not sure it has the same pizzaz as this other stuff we're seeing.

> I have a tentative work entitled "Why PG is wrong about the color of the HN menubar,"...

You get to disagree about the menubar color at 250+ karma.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#46
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tech meetup is pretty decent http://newtech.meetup.com/1/

Tech meetup is full of entrepreneur-wannabes, FAIL. Someone I met was throwing around the idea of a language agnostic hacker meetup with a simple programming/logic puzzle as the barrier to entry. Much better idea than tech-meetup! PS. See http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=240529 for our new ruby meetup :) Sorry about the self-promotion...

Agreed. I have been highly disappointed and unsatisfied with most of the tech meetups I have attended. The large majority of attendees I have met at the events are merely non-hackers with an "idea for a website."

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#47
post #20

When PG says New York City, I usually take it to mean Manhattan. Brooklyn and Queens are both pretty awesome. If anyone here is from NYC, I'd love to start some real-life gatherings for YC'ers. Edit: on this topic, I believe reddit started in brooklyn and later relocated. Can anyone confirm?

Reddit started in Boston. Although, it may have originally been conceived in Charlottesville (back me up here Alexis?). Regardless, not a Brooklyn start-up.

I'm down for NYC YC gatherings.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#48
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In NYC, they have laws that a renter must earn an annual income that is 52x the monthly rent to qualify to rent the apartment (yes, subletting from someone is one way around it). In NYC, a 1BR apartment that you live in by yourself is a status symbol. The average monthly rent is north of $2,500. Spending $2k+ on rent just to live in the city, maybe that's more about ego than it is about money..

Maybe that's the reason a lot of startup action is happening in Brooklyn, where all the cool designer types and hackers are moving to. The rent is lower and the people are just nicer, in DUMBO where our startup is based there's atleast 5 other startups in a 10 block radius. Which, while not SoMa is still pretty good :)

I live in Brooklyn (Williamsburg) and I know there is a lot of start-up activity around me as well. It's easy to build a web app, but building a beautiful web app requires some incredibly artistic and design-conscious people which I think NYC (and especially Brooklyn) are chock full of.

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#49
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if the banking thing isn't as much of a problem as it seems. I work as a financial recruiter, and one of the patterns I see is an on/off relationship with startups and banks, e.g. working two years at Goldman, then one year at a new search engine, then a year at Credit Suisse, then three years starting up a new wiki-based whatsit. If you know you can quit and -- within a few months -- be earning a great livi…

It doesn't work in quite the same way for physicists/quants though. Once you leave physics and go into finance it's extremely hard to make the jump back -- a few years in finance puts you way behind your peers in the race for publications, and you're pretty much stuck there forever. The startup scene is far more forgiving to its apostates than the physics scene is. I personally wish it were easier for physicists to s…

This gentleman managed: www.ams.sunysb.edu/~frey/Biographical/Resume_RJFrey_20060907_11.pdf

Re: Why Paul Graham is wrong about New York City

#50
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point of submitting this wasn't to pick on pg -- it's a thoughtful piece, and adds a new voice to the discussion. Interesting conversations have two sides.

Thats true. It was not a comment about this article, it was a joke about many articles appearing in a short time frame all disagreeing with PG in some way or another. All the responses seem to have come out at once. Conversations are good, although I have a running disagreement on a different thread over the logic of some comments, I have to say they are enjoyable to read.

It could be a wave returning after he published quite a few in a short batch of time recently. Also I've felt that the newer ones aren't as convincing as some of the older essays.
Post reply on HN