Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
theatlantic.com
Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#2This might not be a bad thing. I remember the late 60's and early 70's being an incredibly innovative time in education: likely when many of the Baby Boomer teachers were stretching their wings.
Experimental schools, "free schools", open classrooms, self-paced learning etc. It was a time when you knew someone that attended a Montessori school, when we were moving to the Metric system...
In short it was a time of optimism and trying out new ideas. If the current crop of teachers can get out from under the yoke of "Common Core" or these other top-down initiatives we might see some innovation in education again.
And frankly school might become fun again as well.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#3Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#4As an aside, despite the article's assertions, there is very little evidence that experience improves teaching ability, despite many studies on the matter.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#5I hope not.
I think teachers should teach to the status quo and let students when they are older or their parents make the decision about what they are going to protest, and what changes they are going to push for.
In general, I think students, especially young students, should be shrieked from the ugliness of life as much as possible so they can focus on learning the educational and social skills that will help them in life. Teach to give them the tools so that they can make their own decision when they get older.
Otherwise, if teachers are really using their pedagogy as protest, expect to see even more erosion of support for the public education system, and even more fracturing of the social bonds as schools are chosen , not for their ability to educate, but whether what they indoctrinate matches up with their parents’ wishes.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#6> In the next five years, most of America’s most experienced teachers will retire. The Baby Boomers are leaving behind a nation of more novice educators. In 1988, a teacher most commonly had 15 years of experience. Less than three decades later, that number had fallen to just three years leading a classroom. This might not be a bad thing. I remember the late 60's and early 70's being an incredibly innovative time in…
I think the state has to ensure that education is broadly available and not let people fall behind. But you can only administrate so much to ensure good quality of education.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#7Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#8This is true of all career fields at all times.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#9> In the next five years, most of America’s most experienced teachers will retire. This is true of all career fields at all times.
> In 1988, a teacher most commonly had 15 years of experience. Less than three decades later, that number had fallen to just three years leading a classroom.
Re: Teaching isn’t about managing behavior
#10I was a teacher for fifteen years. The writer of this article started about the same time I got into the profession, so has nearly 20 years of experience.
The first thing you need to do with any class is manage behavior. This can be tricky in your first couple of years, but after a while it just becomes part of who you are. You're more confident in the classroom, you have a reputation in the school, you can recognise and shutdown disruptive behavior before any of the other kids have realised something is about to kick off. At that point your classroom changes, and you can practice what the author calls "Reality Pedagogy", or any other type of pedagogy you like.
Believe me, having observed and mentored plenty of student teachers over the years, the first thing you need to tackle is behavior management. Once that is established then you have the opportunity to be the "captain, my captain" teacher, or whatever you like really.