Earlier quoted context omitted.
The people who can’t perform labor worth more than a few dollars an hour.
Does the problem really lie in those people, themselves, or in the circumstances that led to their labor being worth so little?
Of course, we understand this is a pretty useless way of looking at things.
From a consequentialist standpoint, the incentives work out the best when we use the heuristic of assigning responsibility for low labor value to the person performing the labor, so that's the approximation I choose to use. You could choose to think that e.g. being very stupid is no one's fault, so a very stupid person should get paid as much as a brilliant doctor, but the net social consequences of this are pretty well explored and pretty bad.