Earlier quoted context omitted.
The question for me is twofold. First, will isolating China from the US and it's client states actually do anything to make the CCP act in a way that will respect human rights more? I think it is pretty clear that won't be the case. Second of all, is the entity that stands to benefit actually going to be better for human rights? In this case it pretty much is a zero-sum game. This is a bit more debatable, but I don't…
> I don't think that if the US won this Cold War against China the situation for human rights in the world will become any better. That's true, but you need to contrast it with the other outcome - if China wins, human rights everywhere are very likely to become much worse . That itself is a really good reason to support the US / West.
TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
161–170 of 433 posts
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#162Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure why you’re being downvoted. What you said is factually correct. Like 3000+ anti Trump stories on NYTimes. Try that in China?
That's fair, on the other hand, is China semiregularly bombing hospitals in the Middle East? You can cherry-pick certain facts to suit you either way. As for "free press", the U.S. has the appearance of free press that is shockingly uniform on issues of war for example, controlled by very few entities in total.
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#164The founder of SMIC on the mainland is actually Taiwanese and a former TSMC executive. Loyalties cut across the strait both ways, westerners overemphasis attachment to values and ideology over bloodlines and ancestry. It's true for some but not for others. There are quite a lot of foreign engineers working on the mainland, especially Taiwanese engineers. If you are a industry vet or got some kind of special talent yo…
Really now?
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, had never thought from that angle, especially since Russia and China for most part seem chummy. But in reality, they are neighbors and China has (or is in the process of) replacing Russia as the #2 power. So, while US has a lot to be careful for, it does indeed make sense that Russia has a more immediate threat. If China becomes more powerful, it will start flexing muscle as the Russia-China border also,…
I don't think that theory is as true as you believe. China ceded a whole lot of territory to Russia without too much of a fuss. The whole of Mongolia was part of Qing, and they gave that up. Dittobfor Vladivostok. China's border disputes with India was created by the British, who just draw a line somewhere without consent. China offered to draw turn the Line of Actual Control into the official border, which means Chi…
Contrast with the ROC (Taiwan), which officially still includes it as far as I know although it treats it as an independent country in practice.
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. But I don't think that giving more power to the US Empire will be better for human rights long term. The US and it's client states also kill millions of people for profit.
Do.. you have a citation for that?
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think that theory is as true as you believe. China ceded a whole lot of territory to Russia without too much of a fuss. The whole of Mongolia was part of Qing, and they gave that up. Dittobfor Vladivostok. China's border disputes with India was created by the British, who just draw a line somewhere without consent. China offered to draw turn the Line of Actual Control into the official border, which means Chi…
The PRC recognised Mongolia because it is not in a strategic location and because it needed the USSR. Contrast with the ROC (Taiwan), which officially still includes it as far as I know although it treats it as an independent country in practice.
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's fair, on the other hand, is China semiregularly bombing hospitals in the Middle East? You can cherry-pick certain facts to suit you either way. As for "free press", the U.S. has the appearance of free press that is shockingly uniform on issues of war for example, controlled by very few entities in total.
Hard to tell without a free press
I guess our situation with getting news from Facebook is voluntary censorship. Maybe that’s better than forced censorship?
What if the controller of news is benevolent?
I think the situation is that the Chinese government is mostly benevolent to its own citizens, which is why it has fairly good political support domestically. They are however not benevolent to the US interests, which is why we want to stop them. One benefit of a free press is that we’d be able to introduce our own propaganda into the country to push agendas that benefit ourselves.
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#169The founder of SMIC on the mainland is actually Taiwanese and a former TSMC executive. Loyalties cut across the strait both ways, westerners overemphasis attachment to values and ideology over bloodlines and ancestry. It's true for some but not for others. There are quite a lot of foreign engineers working on the mainland, especially Taiwanese engineers. If you are a industry vet or got some kind of special talent yo…
Other than the money, you also need to count in the fact that as an Asian/Chinese you are not really that secure/free in the US especially now with a president saying Chinese Virus all the time.
Re: TSMC plans to halt chip supplies to Huawei in 2 months
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
For things like this there isn't a "the U.S." there's groups of people, interest groups, political economy, political will, etc. If China were rapidly liberalizing and didn't have stains on their reputation like the HK protest lockdowns, minority subjugation, and horrible prison conditions it would be a lot harder to push any of these changes through. As it stands, democrats and republicans are both turning hawkish o…
Except US gov responses to cripple Huawei predates the liberalization narrative. China is the largest purchaser of western semi products, private industry in this sector absolutely wants to continue sales. Hence US was forced to implement entity list, twice, to starve Huawei of components. Prior, US has been unilaterally crippling Chinese semi efforts via CFIUS and other instruments before HK/XJ, since MadeInChina202…