Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mate, shut up with the nonsense. There are many scientific concepts that originated in Asian/MiddleEastern civilizations that simply happen to have a European name because the latter person popularized it in the West.
the reason "politics" are so derided on this website is because these guys can't stop themselves from impulsively showing their true colors (and exposing the very endemic racism at hand in the process!) at the drop of a hat
NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
71–80 of 111 posts
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The majority of things are named after white men to the exclusion of everyone else. That's because the majority of scientific achievements to date, have been by white men. I'm not celebrating that fact, I'm just pointing out the source of the statistic you've pointed out. The things weren't named because the person was a white male, they were named because of a tremendous achievement that happened to be made by a w…
I would argue that the level of success and contribution despite racism, which is a significant hurdle, makes it so that nothing is being inflated. Also I get your point that at NASA and in the USA we have mostly white scientist until recently, but I take issue with your statement about the majority of scientific achievements. Historically there are thousands upon thousands of Arab and Chinese scientific achievements…
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is nothing meritorious about being black, or being a female, or being white, or being male. You cannot choose your race, or your biological sex. You didn't earn these traits, and you aren't a better or worse human being for having any of them. The NASA HQ was named after somebody to celebrate traits they didn't earn or choose. There are plenty of engineers that were objectively better engineers (I'm sure there…
> If their achievements were that incredible, we would've heard much more about them. No? Minorities are marginalized all the time.
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope you're joking. There is nothing more dishonoring and patronizing than to change the goal posts for somebody, just because of their race.
Speaking from your vast experience as a POC, I'm sure. I guess you'd be ok if I spoke for white people?
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#75If some historian digs up a previous African American engineer, will they change the name? No.
A while ago the Federal Marshall Service wanted to name their headquarters after Wyatt Earp. There was outrage, and they backed off.
Something tells me that won’t happen here.
Downvote away.
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I want to remind them we dont live in a meritocratic society The reason I love the sciences is that in general, people are more meritocratic in those circles compared to others. I've found especially in scientific academia that people are far more meritocratic compared to other disciplines. This also applies at science/engineering companies. No, not at all levels (the more business-y you get, the less of a meritocr…
As an actual scientist, no, science is not particularly meritocratic or objective. The current scientific world is highly catered towards people that can afford to devote their 20s and 30s to a low-paying job. Because of in-group dynamics, it also maintains the existing population make-up, which is predominantly white or Asian.
If you mean that gifted people should have their livelihood subsidised by the state, then sure, I'm open to exploring merit based scholarships, and society investing more in the sciences and so on. But nobody gets a prize in science without actually putting in the work and achieving something. Though, admittedly we are seeing that less and less. Society in general is becoming less meritorious (participation awards, etc).
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I want to remind them we dont live in a meritocratic society The reason I love the sciences is that in general, people are more meritocratic in those circles compared to others. I've found especially in scientific academia that people are far more meritocratic compared to other disciplines. This also applies at science/engineering companies. No, not at all levels (the more business-y you get, the less of a meritocr…
You sound like a man who thinks they diserve recognition yourself and seem to be jealous. Check out your ego, you might become a more beautiful person if you shed some of it
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#78When this nonsense stop? It was funny at the beginning but it's not any longer.
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
If only Neil Armstrong had accomplished something significant outside Hollywood, perhaps then he would be worthy of having a building at Edwards named after him, is what you're saying? (he is a particularly bad exemplar of the point you are trying to make)
Dryden was much more important to NASA than Armstrong was. Armstrong was lucky to be assigned Apollo 11; he was not the best test pilot (having crashed an X-15 due to his own recklessness). If they were going to pick people who greatly contributed to the success of the Apollo program, they should have picked Houbolt.
Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mate, shut up with the nonsense. There are many scientific concepts that originated in Asian/MiddleEastern civilizations that simply happen to have a European name because the latter person popularized it in the West.
the reason "politics" are so derided on this website is because these guys can't stop themselves from impulsively showing their true colors (and exposing the very endemic racism at hand in the process!) at the drop of a hat
Yes, this is a throwaway. Yes, I shouldn't do it. But frankly, it's the only way I would ever comment on something like this. Everyone involved in American culture war subjects is too toxic. Too many norms of debate about almost every topic are toxic. It'll be the end of your country if this continues.