This is remarkable, even to me. The main point: if you're doing a startup, things take a long time. Longer than you'd expect. And overnight success is anything but.
Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
41–50 of 50 posts
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#42"Older" hackers take note: Biz Stone, Evan Williams: 30+ founders club. They were both over thirty when twitter started.
Ev started his first company when he was a teen, and kept starting them over and over again. Biz had founded Xanga, many years before. Sure, they were over 30, i think Jack and Noah were too, when twitter got started. All of them had started earlier companies in their teen's and 20's.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#43Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#44"We receive about 100 status updates per day". 5 years later, the average number of tweets per day is 140 MILLION. (According to http://blog.twitter.com/2011/03/numbers.html )
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
The name has always been "Twitter," but they were wanting to get the SMS short code "twttr." Unfortunately for them (fortunately for us?) someone already had it. :)
It was always PRONOUNCED twitter, but we did write it twttr, everywhere, back in the day.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was always PRONOUNCED twitter, but we did write it twttr, everywhere, back in the day.
Right, that's what I meant. :)
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#47For nostalgia's sake (if it's suitable to reveal), what was the original number that Twitter used?
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
> (As a sidenote: can I just point out that facebook's API is freaking awesome?) No you may not. Facebooks API is horrible. I was just implementing the like buttons on my site and realized that they have to be iframes (even the FBXML or whatever its called creates iframes). This turns out a bit ridiculous on pages such as yours (if you put them on the feed page) and mine where you Twitter on the other hand allows you…
Well, you could write your own, but you'd have to have users authenticate the application. In my opinion, this isn't much different than twitter, since both actions would require two clicks: facebook: click your custom widget -> facebook prompt -> perform action twitter: click your custom widget -> twitter prompt -> perform action (Or just do like I do, and change the size of the iframe to 450x20)
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#49This is a great story that put a bunch of hot air in our balloon tonight as we realized we're actually not too far off this track.
We have no expectation of being another Twitter by any possible stretch of the imagination, but finding out that at this early stage we're tracking with a reasonable expectation is a great point of validation.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is an excellent point. "Create an about page" is at the top of my list of things to do as soon as I get off of work. I made this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1rOJJWyU2s but it was wayyyy too long.
No – don't make an about page. Well sure, make one, but it probably won't help a great deal. You need to be showing people what it's about, the instant they visit your site. I saw your page, thought "hmm, not quite sure what this is" and left. I'm not going to stick around to read an about page.