Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#2"We receive about 100 status updates per day". 5 years later, the average number of tweets per day is 140 MILLION.
(According to http://blog.twitter.com/2011/03/numbers.html)
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#3This is remarkable, even to me. The main point: if you're doing a startup, things take a long time. Longer than you'd expect. And overnight success is anything but.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#4This is remarkable, even to me. The main point: if you're doing a startup, things take a long time. Longer than you'd expect. And overnight success is anything but.
That's actually kind of a relief, especially considering all the news you hear about 10000 users in 72 hours, it seems like if you don't explode onto the scene you're a failure.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#5Link is dead or down, I can't wait to read this!
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#6Link is dead or down, I can't wait to read this!
Not sure what happened, sshing in to the server and poking around.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#7Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#8Google Cache Link : http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?sclient=psy&...
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#9I'll be the first to say... Thank you for putting the vowels back in your name. "Twttr" looks horrible.
Re: Internal status email: Twitter at 3 months old. 160 Users & 100 Tweets per day
#10Google Cache Link : http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?sclient=psy&...
How did you find that? I found the original article in Google but there was no link to a cached version.