FFmpeg 4.3
ffmpeg.org
FFmpeg 4.3
1–10 of 226 posts
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#2Changelog: https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blob/master/Changelog
Seems like the big feature is Vulkan support?
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#3Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio.
I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#4Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio. I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
why duplicate something that works really well?
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#5Changelog: https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/blob/master/Changelog Seems like the big feature is Vulkan support?
Excellent summary of changes here: https://9to5linux.com/ffmpeg-4-3-released-with-vulkan-suppor...
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#6Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio. I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
What ever happened to Facebook's (or was it Netflix?) technology to create a new unit of time measurement to help align audio and video files? I believe it was called a "flick"...
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#7Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio. I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
I don't know much, but isn't Audacity a thing?
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#8Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio. I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
I mean there's plenty of open source stuff for audio. Visualization/oscilloscope tools included.
But that kind of visualization isn't what I'd call "basic" functionality, since it's functionally useless for the vast majority of audio applications.
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#9ffmpeg is amazing, but it’s like tar on steroids: I can never remember the right incantation. Google is required for even the simplest of things.
I don’t know if it’s their goal, but I’d love a more user friendly set of command line arguments.
Re: FFmpeg 4.3
#10Can someone explain to me how FFmpeg seems to be the only open-source software to do even just basic functionality with audio. I was looking at getting the sound wave graph for a piece of audio a while ago, and not only was FFmpeg the only option I found to be able to do it, it was amazingly fast and also free.
why duplicate something that works really well?
- You don't trust so much complex logic, taking untrusted input, written in C and want to rewrite it in Rust.
- You want to code it all again using an API that doesn't expect to get its input from a blocking read() function.
- ...
I think the main reason there isn't any alternative is that it supports soooo many formats that the task seems impossible to anybody thinking about it.