Live data from Hacker News

Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

redditblog.com

181–190 of 393 posts

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#181

Why stick to the insular Silicon Valley club and not get someone who's devoted their life to civil rights? There are a ton of community activists who could actually bring a fresh perspective. EDIT: I do not mean to question his particular qualifications or his commitment to change, only to comment on the fact that it could have been someone from a different walk of life. Tech leadership in Silicon Valley does not app…

Presumably the duties of a Silicon Valley board member would center on running a Silicon Valley company, which a Silicon Valley CEO would be uniquely qualified to do.

Wasn't Dick Costolo a standup comic?

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that complicated. Start by working to deal with the platform being used to spread racism and hate speach and go from there.

Board members aren't really in a position to work on specific problems - their role is to set high-level priorities, and Reddit's already indicated fighting hate speech is a priority. If you want someone who's empowered to make specific concrete changes, that's not a board member.

There's some glaringly obvious action they could take in a moment if they actually wanted to do something about fighting hate speech. They don't.

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#183
post #101
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What more is there to do with reddit? All their new ideas in the last 5 years have been poached from other social sites that did it first. It will always be a cesspool in the same manner that twitter and facebook with always be cesspools but that's more a reflection on society than management. They will always be pawns in the bot game, political game and advertising/sponsorship game because they are conduits only. No…

> Nothing good comes out of reddit that is not put into reddit from the outside. The good that comes from inside Reddit is the curation, as much as everyone likes to complain about it. They have become more proactive about banning hate and grief subreddits and have a system for reporting and shadowbanning bad faith individuals. If anything one could argue they come down a little too hard on borderline controversial s…

"Curation"?

By five totally unaccountable mods, all pushing brands for money?

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/gitwbo/p...

That curation is "The good that comes from inside Reddit"???

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#184

Being a republican, I'm scared of the leadership choices social platforms are making. Michael Seibel is a pro-Democrat and anti republican and anti-Trump. For god sake, allow reddit to have free-speech and don't censor the voices of "silent majority" in the USA. P.S 60M American citizens voted for Trump.

I don't see why Republicans can't just use another platform like gab or voat if they think reddit has become hostile to them. Reddit being a private company has every right to control what ideologies are promoted on their pages just as you have every right to start your own reddit clone and moderate it however you feel.

There's even an open source core with which to start from: https://github.com/reddit-archive/reddit

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#185
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let me know when you figure out how to build a social network that can profit from social good. These days, profit and social good are rarely aligned.

This reads to me as a stunning indictment of social networks and profit more than it does a defense of Reddit's board choice and their potential motivations.

> This reads to me as a stunning indictment of social networks

Or more generally, going back to the grandparent post here, this reads to me as a stunning indictment of Silicon Valley...

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that complicated. Start by working to deal with the platform being used to spread racism and hate speach and go from there.

Board members aren't really in a position to work on specific problems - their role is to set high-level priorities, and Reddit's already indicated fighting hate speech is a priority. If you want someone who's empowered to make specific concrete changes, that's not a board member.

A board is empowered to fire management who "indicate fighting hate speech is a priority", but who's actions show that's barely ever more than PR blowback driven lip service...

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#187
post #87

Dear Reddit, for the love of Mike .. PLEASE treat reddit as a web-first platform. You are killing the golden goose by trying to force people toward the app - by gradually removing features and usability from the mobile web site and constantly reminding people they "should" use the app. I don't want reddit as an 'app', I want reddit to be readable/scrollable on mobile and web without any form of coercion.

All those "it's better on the app" pop ups make me sad for the web team that had to implement an interstitial trashing their own work.

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#188
post #87

Dear Reddit, for the love of Mike .. PLEASE treat reddit as a web-first platform. You are killing the golden goose by trying to force people toward the app - by gradually removing features and usability from the mobile web site and constantly reminding people they "should" use the app. I don't want reddit as an 'app', I want reddit to be readable/scrollable on mobile and web without any form of coercion.

I absolutely hate being forced into using the app. The screen real estate that it takes up, the constant nagging, the deprecation of features in favor of an app. It’s anti-user.

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#189
post #22

I struggle to see any successful path for reddit that doesn’t devolve into being more like Facebook. Godspeed to the new CEO and I look forward to hearing their vision for the company.

There is nothing good that doesn't have an optimal size. Growth mandates eventually kill everything good.

Or at least necessitate it changing into something totally different from what made it good in the first place. The best you can hope for is that the new thing is also incidentally good.

Re: Reddit Welcomes Michael Seibel to Board of Directors

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not bringing in a new CEO. All people are asking for is _one_ outsider voice on the board.

> All people are asking for is _one_ outsider voice on the board. I'm curious what people think the end result of such a thing would be. Does having an outside voice actually contribute to better outcomes for the company? Is there a reason people couldn't just advocate for the current board to listen to other people in their time rather than having a dedicated "outside voice" position? I've seen outsiders come into c…

> Does having an outside voice actually contribute to better outcomes for the company?

Well, gee, I don't know, maybe having someone ask why it always takes being in the news before Reddit's management decide that it's a bad idea to host underage porn or literal Nazis, rather than, you know, treating it as a bad idea.

Post reply on HN