Trying to break the conditioning here but government should always tax in a way that it incentive WORK. The way things are Wealth is no longer being produced, so those who have it will be on top because income will never be enough to prop you up. Therefore we should want a Growth market so that more wealth is produced and risk averse people will still be rich but more people will become as rich as them. To resolve In…
Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
71–80 of 476 posts
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes of course they'd want that, but compromise is often a necessity to prevent things from spiraling totally out of control. The French and Russian revolutions are a testament to what happens when the ruler tries to effect the appearance of compromise without actually doing it (e.g. Constitution of 1906). It ended very badly for the rulers in both of those cases. They fucked up a lot more than just that, but that was…
The difference is in the times of the French revolution, the elite lived only mere miles away from the angry poor, within striking reach of their wrath whereas now the elites can move to super safe heavens, isolated from the mess they created and suffer no consequences from the angry masses. Jeff Bezos and Warren Buffett can move with their families to some private island in the Caribbean and wait while things cool d…
Part of the problem was that he left it too long to attempt fleeing.
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Automation is a drop in the ocean compared to the effects of trade agreements that resulted in jobs being exported.
Jobs exported to countries where the violent suppression of workers rights and of any kind of actual democracy wouldn't cause a fuss at home. What the US establishment refers to as keeping a country 'business-friendly'.
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#74In almost all USA industries, there is increasing amount of consolidation. The top 4 companies' in almost any industry has a larger share of the total market: https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/03/26/too-much-of-a-... Some consolidation is natural, but a huge part is caused by mergers and acquisitions (M&A) fulled by Private Equity. The M&A benefits the shareholders of participating companies at the expense of c…
From Bloomberg: ==About 3,600 firms were listed on U.S. stock exchanges at the end of 2017, down more than half from 1997.==
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-04-09/where-...
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#75+1 Comparing wages to corporate profitability, valuations. Drives me nuts when these aspects are treated as completely unrelated. I'm still deeply ambivalent about redistribution, cashectomies, etc. But it'd a lot easier to remain neutral if there was (a lot) more profit sharing. Also, I have a hunch that gross inequity is related to the "missing productivity". I'm hoping someone is researching this.
It's a structural issue. Corporations are designed to extract as much value for shareholders as possible, paying employees as little as possible is a part of that. That includes all levels of compensation, such as awarding shares to employees.
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#76Trying to break the conditioning here but government should always tax in a way that it incentive WORK. The way things are Wealth is no longer being produced, so those who have it will be on top because income will never be enough to prop you up. Therefore we should want a Growth market so that more wealth is produced and risk averse people will still be rich but more people will become as rich as them. To resolve In…
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you back that up with data? I'm curious to know by how much and how you reached that conclusion.
It's something that's so obviously common sense that you really don't need a study to back it up - let alone in today's culture any study that would even suggest this would be in the news with labels of 'racist' or 'alt-right'.
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#78In almost all USA industries, there is increasing amount of consolidation. The top 4 companies' in almost any industry has a larger share of the total market: https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/03/26/too-much-of-a-... Some consolidation is natural, but a huge part is caused by mergers and acquisitions (M&A) fulled by Private Equity. The M&A benefits the shareholders of participating companies at the expense of c…
There are fewer publicly traded companies and the ones that do exists are larger than ever. From Bloomberg: ==About 3,600 firms were listed on U.S. stock exchanges at the end of 2017, down more than half from 1997.== https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-04-09/where-...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/04/business/shrinking-stock-...
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#79Trying to break the conditioning here but government should always tax in a way that it incentive WORK. The way things are Wealth is no longer being produced, so those who have it will be on top because income will never be enough to prop you up. Therefore we should want a Growth market so that more wealth is produced and risk averse people will still be rich but more people will become as rich as them. To resolve In…
I would argue that millions (if not billions) are injected into corr^Wlobbying to make sure that we never fully have this mindset, indeed.
Meanwhile, the rich are way less taxed (proportionally) than the middle class, and in my opinion, that's a problem that stifle Western economies.
Re: Declining worker power vs. rising monopoly power: explaining recent macro trends
#80The big issue is supply and demand. With increasing automation and global supply chains, there is a huge amount of labor available relative to the need. In the past, a union strike at a plant would see a generous long-term contract and benefits for the workers. Now, it is likely for the plant to be moved or workers replaced with automation.
Larry Summers is simply not credible. This is an "oh fuck things are about to get out of hand, let's try to insert ourselves into the debate so we don't get locked out" paper. Here is Larry Summers from his 1998 speech "The Challenges of Success". " The world looks very different than it did at the beginning of this decade, a time when America was said to be in decline. It is now clear that America will grow faster i…