Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whether you agree with any particular Controversial Political Figure or not, using one as an example will annoy about 50% of your audience (variable, of course, with your audience's current politicization and self-selection). Using neutral examples will help keep the focus on your message rather than incidental politics.
> will annoy about 50% Why? I'm conservative but I've taken tips from Obama and Bill Clinton. A good idea is a good idea. That Obama and Clinton are successful is all the more reason to pay attention when they give productivity advice, even though I disagree with several of their policies.
Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
21–30 of 309 posts
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#22I’m terrified of picking up new systems like this without having a purpose. I could spend hours building out a graph, admiring all of MY knowledge, but not really have any intended use for it other than telling others about it and how I’m going to use it someday.
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#23Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#24It's important to keep in mind that Zettelkasten's creator was an academic in the humanities. When I tried this system, I found it really shone when my goal was literature review -- i.e. to weave together arguments from disparate sources and articles, particularly when there was no quantitative or numeric way to do that weaving (e.g. in a table). I think that more technical and quantitative subjects do not benefit as…
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#25People love doing things that feel like work, but aren’t. I’m terrified of picking up new systems like this without having a purpose. I could spend hours building out a graph, admiring all of MY knowledge, but not really have any intended use for it other than telling others about it and how I’m going to use it someday.
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#26People love doing things that feel like work, but aren’t. I’m terrified of picking up new systems like this without having a purpose. I could spend hours building out a graph, admiring all of MY knowledge, but not really have any intended use for it other than telling others about it and how I’m going to use it someday.
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#27This looks interesting, but one potential problem with this method is that you start treating the number of notes or the size of the graph as a success metric. The author even notes how it is 'pleasing' to see their note graph grow in size. This could be a perverse incentive.
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to elaborate why?
He's an anti-scientific schmuck. I basically stopped reading this post 3 sentences after seeing the reference to JP, as clearly this person can't distinguish what's shit from what's useful, as evidenced by this over-involved note overaccumulation system. Also sure, what's-his-face wrote 70 books, but I had never heard of him before. Quantity before volume please, is what note-taking should be about.
Is that because his output is insignificant, or your knowledge was limited?
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Care to elaborate why?
Whether you agree with any particular Controversial Political Figure or not, using one as an example will annoy about 50% of your audience (variable, of course, with your audience's current politicization and self-selection). Using neutral examples will help keep the focus on your message rather than incidental politics.
Re: Stop Taking Regular Notes; Use a Zettelkasten Instead
#30> Though it’s still early days, adopting a Zettelkasten has been one of my most productive habits. If productivity is measured against the volume of notes taken, sure. Otherwise probably not. Notes are an intermediate step to build something else, which is the real output on which productivity is usually measured.