Earlier quoted context omitted.
My laptop's display panel is almost 10 years old, and has about 96% AdobeRGB coverage. 100% sRGB should be considered barely above shit-tier. Probably fine if you don't do any photo or video editing ever, I guess?
If you're doing photo/video editing for web, sRGB is your target anyway. This is a $530 laptop btw. Which 10 year old laptop had 96% Adobe RGB coverage, out of curiosity?
The spec says it's supposed to have 90% NTSC coverage. I've had it calibrated with a colorimeter, which tells me it has the following properties:
* 89.0% DCI-P3 coverage
* 97.8% AdobeRGB coverage
Here's the graph of its gamut vs sRGB.[2] I edit a lot of photos (though never professionally), and honestly I would never edit on an sRGB screen. Plus, what about HDR video? It's becoming extremely common these days.
[1] http://www.yslcd.com.tw/docs/product/B173HW01%20V.4.pdf
[2] https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/Qmaq6553VxMazANuLiFh95aW6fA...