Live data from Hacker News

Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

yahoo.com

131–140 of 746 posts

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#131

What is stopping companies that make money (to pay for UBI through tax increases) from leaving the country to elsewhere with lower taxation? Where would this money come from then? If things do get automated it means labor is no longer needed to be sourced locally, making it much easier to uproot and go elsewhere.

Where would they go? Every other country has a VAT tax and to pay for the version of UBI that Yang proposes would be a VAT tax at half the European rate.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#132
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if you did it in some moderately isolated place, like Alaska? Alaska already has almost-universal not-quite-basic income: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Permanent_Fund

The annual dividend is around $1000. I wouldn’t call this UBI exactly.

Many people actually survive on that one check. Alaskans are fiercely independent for the most part, and those living outside the main cities are typically self-sustainable. They own their land, hunt for their meat, grow their veggies, trade for what they don't have, and spend whatever money they do have on the essential tools to sustain that.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you saying that housing, education and health care haven’t seen massive price increases over the last few decades?

He didn't say that at all He alluded to how those systems being over-regulated and broken prevent the usual economic factors from working. E.g. if you don't allow people to build new houses in certain places then that makes it quite easy for housing prices to go up in those areas

Then let’s fix those first before talking about UBI.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#134
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you believe welfare is similar in that regard? If not, why?

No. Healthy public housing, universal healthcare, free public transit don't have the same ability for the benefits to be converted to income for a landlord.

I think any situation where you know that payment is guaranteed there is the potential for profiteering.

In universal healthcare, insurance knows the government will foot the bill and can tack on a little more.

In my experience this is the case when dealing with large entities. This is slightly the case with government contracts. They are a cash cow of sorts.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#135
post #113

Years ago, proponents of UBI claimed that it was a replacement for all other forms of social welfare. Now it appears by most proposals to be yet another means-tested add-on. What happened?

Yep and as a replacement, it was supposed to drastically cut administrative costs.

I think that was a major point, too, because a significant portion of the money available for social assistance is spent on deciding who can get it and fighting 'fraud'. A blanket universal give is a lot easier.

However - I've always been puzzled by how each person in the US doesn't have a public, singularly identifying number assigned. Doesn't that make even an 'universal' basic income hard to define? How do you guarantee that every person gets one, and only one, BI check every month? How do you find out who is dead and should stop getting one...?

From what I know, SSN are used for stuff like that, but there's all this weird stuff about it (althoug I admit my knowledge of it comes from a half forgotten CGP Grey video, and that the impression that stuck)

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#137

I don’t think there is any good way to test UBI at any small scale, I think there needs to be a critical mass of people who can pay their housing and food costs how society and economic activity would be reshaped under such a system.

I think the idea that it needs to be tested before just jumping in and trying it somewhere is just a way to state that you don’t support it. Which is fine, but just say that.

If there had been the same testing requirements around say Capitalism, Communism, and Socialism we’d never have seen any of them rolled out.

At some point you have to buy in to the ethos and goals and be prepared to adapt along the way.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#138
post #117

If interested, this provides a brief historical perspective, with the pros and cons of UBI: https://news.stanford.edu/2020/03/24/moment-universal-basic-...

This doesn't provide any view into pros/cons tho. Mostly statements about what happened and is happening. Not very useful from that perspective.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#139

Years ago, proponents of UBI claimed that it was a replacement for all other forms of social welfare. Now it appears by most proposals to be yet another means-tested add-on. What happened?

Because replacing all other forms of social welfare is completely impractical from a political standpoint in either the short or medium term. It would involve huge societal changes that would require most people to rethink how government works. That isn't something that would happen quickly. If you are a UBI proponent, you can either spend multiple decades fighting that fight before you see any progress or you compromise on a more feasible implementation.

Re: Jack Dorsey is giving Andrew Yang $5M to build the case for a basic income

#140

If the government starts giving me enough money each month to subsist while drastically raising taxes on my earnings from employment then I'll simply stop working. I would imagine most people would do the same.

You’d imagine that’s what will happen, but you might be surprised.
Post reply on HN