Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
141–150 of 283 posts
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
Last study I read put a 99% correlation on vitamin d deficiency and getting a severe case of covid19. Which was significantly more than age correlated on the same dataset.
Interesting, however I wonder how they accounted for the fact that most everyone is deficient in vitamin d.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
But nowadays private interests can cross international borders with ease, while governments cannot.
A polluting factory has to exist somewhere. Edit: I am getting a lot of down votes so let me clarify: if external costs are not internalised, humans will ignore it. Internalising the cost does not even need to mean tax. Many clothing brands in my country, even the budget brands (think Walmart), have been pressured by consumers into using more ethical factories. The same could be done by forcing companies to disclose…
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
isn't the 70B of farm animals just a part of the "7.5B humans" problem? Anyway, i think that it is a crying shame that we're still farming animals instead of growing artificial meat. Once we finally have artificial meat and thus stop killing sentient beings, i think that would result in a great leap in our conscience, empathy, etc. - it will unleash a great deal of human mental development with natural results in soc…
Every time I see discussions like this I never see thoughts on what to do with all those animals. What do you do with the 70B animals we're no longer consuming?
[until the aliens bring tomorrow the mass production lines of cheap lab meat] Because of naturally gradual process of lab meat quality increase and price decrease there will be no point in time when suddenly "we have 70B animals we're no longer consuming "
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Humans emit different levels of pollution. Your rich cheap-airline flying, consumerist car owner will emit far more than many families in the developing world.
To be fair, mmaunder didn't say which 10% he thinks should be allowed to live. He may be in favour of eliminating the rich cheap-airline flying, consumerist car owners first.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Humans emit different levels of pollution. Your rich cheap-airline flying, consumerist car owner will emit far more than many families in the developing world.
And neither will even approach within several orders of magnitude of Chinese shipping and factories.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But imagine Earth with a stable 10% of our current population. I can't imagine maintaining that in anything other than a brutal and arbitrary way. It's very difficult to separate humans from their humanity, and even in countries where birth limits have been tried, we know that it is an ineffective policy and is ultimately cruel. > Clean, abundant, and without the catastrophic extinction event already underway. Just…
Not at all, just increase tax per child per household. 0-2 children at a normal rate, and increasing per extra child.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you volunteering to go first?
You don't need genocide to reduce population, just birth rate policies. Most developed nations already have declining native populations (sometimes the overall population grows only through immigration). China had a one-child policy for a while. I think the world would be much better if other countries would restrict the reproduction of humans in a sensible way. Only those who can afford to bring up children with a m…
So, then, are you advocating for forced abortions or forced birth control?
What would the penalties be for reproducing without approval?
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which means large corporations get to influence policies, even without any lobbying. "Dear senator, what do you mean those environmental protection regulations apply to us? The regulations of the neighbour country $x, that also invited us to build our 10 000 jobs worth plant on their soil, are nowhere near as onerous. We might need to take them up on their offer. Perhaps at least you can cut us a tax break?"
"Well, dear corporation, if you want to sell your products to our citizens, you have to play by our rules. We'll let you know that your direct competitor already agreed to these rules yesterday."
It was nice dealing with you. I hope you don't mind if I mention your name at the press conference we'll call soon to announce signing of the deal for our new plant with your neighbour."
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which ones of your friends and family members should be culled? You get to keep 10%. Usually this argument boils down to "everyone I know and like should still be allowed to live, but we should totally get rid of billions of anonymous (poor) people"
This is pretty bad faith. It is very unlikely that you're responding to Hitler, of course no one is suggesting we murder 90% of the world's population, that is unspeakably evil. But, with magic, imagine we had every technology we have now but with only 10% of the world's population. It _would_ be incredible, you could fly all over the world to your heart's content, your neighbor could buy a big diesel truck, and your…
I would wager that would increase the amount of people having children.