Who decides authoritatively what is or isn’t “hate speech” within the 24 hour period? The conclusion TFA makes seems likely: these services will just err on the side of “delete first, ask questions later” to protect themselves from liability, making all sorts of legal expression impossible. The current state of online publishing is really sad, and getting worse. Very few modern services used for hosting can be used t…
Being made fun of for anything that people biologically cannot change is hate speech. It’s not some complicated quagmire of laws you are trying to make it out to be.
If you read it carefully, I just “made fun of” people who are unimaginative. Is that an innate trait? Should my content be censored?
Should a comment on a video of a tall person that says “how’s the weather up there?” be censored using criminal liability?
This criminalizes even hosting the discussion about what beliefs along these lines are or are not correct. Someone posts about their (mistaken) beliefs, in essence asking about a disproven theory correlating race and IQ. Other people correct them, educating them as well as any other lurkers. Should the sysadmins go to jail for not deleting the entire thread?
Being wrong on the internet should not be illegal.
There is absolutely not a bright line, and it is somewhat naive or perhaps even dishonest to claim otherwise.