Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The perspective “of you haven’t worked with SAP you are in a small org” is wrong. The fact that you are arguing against this might be why you are getting downvoted. The original comment was saying “if you are in a small org you probably haven’t worked with SAP”, which is not the same thing. Edit for further clarification: I can see how it might look like they were arguing what you stated, but it was more of a Bayes…
You know, I actually like your Bayesian interpretation. My main dislike was the dismissive tone in OPs phrasing, but I think his proposition might be OK.
Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
401–410 of 445 posts
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#402Earlier quoted context omitted.
> At the same time, I guess you have to be at a company of a certain size for it to be relevant to your life... But that perhaps proves the point - HN is very starup focused That’s pretty dismissive. I work at a company with ~80B in revenue, I never interacted or heard of SAP in work context. In fact it is only incidentally that I’ve heard of them previously. There are hundred of thousands of engineers working in com…
And was that a FAAMNG? Presumably the larger, "new-wave" tech companies roll their own solutions of some kind
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#403Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it has to be a startup, i.e. recently founded, hyper growth, usually VC-funded. A company worth a lot of money that has existed for 80 years isn't a unicorn, it's just a company worth $1B+.
When is a startup not a startup anymore. Are Facebook and Google still startups?
Once you're executing on a scalable business model, you're a regular business.
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#404A friend has described these to me as "dark matter companies". They are everywhere, and they permeate industries, but you never see them. They work in small, unmarked offices outside of the standard tech hubs. Some of these companies make billions, but you've never heard of them, and they'd like to keep it that way. In other cases, they're small companies that own a market that's too small for a large competitor to g…
>Hidden champions are relatively small but highly successful companies that are concealed behind a curtain of inconspicuousness, invisibility, and sometimes secrecy.
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#405Earlier quoted context omitted.
One could argue the comparison still holds for developers of video games - as long as the game's code is not touched upon release. Used to be the norm, nowadays admittedly seems to be disappearing.
Also the amount of skilled professionals needed to write a song and to write a game is slightly put - different. A song surely requires a skilled professional. But a game required dozens of those, with years of experience and lots fo time. Creative industries get way lower pay because the skill level needed is low compared to many others, like law, medicine etc. If you are talented you can paint great pictures or be…
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#406Earlier quoted context omitted.
> IT costs about 10% of revenue (some places are as high as 30%, some as low as 2%). That’s the total expense, right? Not just employee remuneration.
Yes. However, it may or may not include equity depending on how things are set up.
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#407Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like SAP does custom App building. Do they use a custom underlying database technology as well? Would it be equivalent to contracting some software system to a a company that would build the system using SQL?
I can't even grasp how you can be so far off the mark. I kind of assumed most people on HN would understand large software platforms and how rolling your own is often not a worthwhile investment. Maybe you should just create your own IDE when you want to write new code or maybe develop our own version of Word when you want to write a letter. How about develop your own email system too? As for the database, traditiona…
Man I'm so stupid. I don't know how to be intelligent like you. Maybe I should write the whole thing in assembly language.
Aside from the sarcasm above can you not grasp how your post is insulting? Have you dealt with people before? Are you human? If you are human are you mentally disabled?
Let me put it this way, obviously I wasn't implying anything you said. I don't even know what ERP is, I haven't even touched it before. My initial post was to find out more, and my next post was to summarize what I thought it was based off the that persons response, but ass holes like you with your superiority complex have to write bullshit answers like this. Don't bother, nobody cares for your drivel.
Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#408Re: Patio11's Law: The software economy is bigger than you think
#409Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean I guess you can throw all that functionality in a bunch of triggers but that would slow down your database to a crawl every time one record updated.
TO rebuild SAP's manufacturing and finance capabilities into your own system would take many many years and cost large sums of money, you are then stuck supporting a custom solution forever and you'll be forever behind your competitors, your industry trends and whatever new tax or other legislation that needs adding to you system. This isn't nodejs and MySQL mate.
I feel you build ERP systems. I feel that you're just trying to defend a life long career of building useless redundant systems.
ERP is just a fancy name for some business software app. That's all man. We're done.