Sometimes I play a game with myself where I read the HN comments first, then read the piece. It's like watching a game of telephone. To my reading a) lidl is NOT launching an AWS competitor, per se b) this is all about the data and the power of the logistics platform Amazon is heavy in the food business. Amazon observes the use of any of its primitive services by any competitors to determine where growth is occurring…
"It's like watching a game of telephone" It's not really a mismatch of the comments and article though. The title of the article is "Lidl owner launching its own rival to Amazon Web Services" . And the body says things like "While Schwarz IT intends to use Europe’s enhanced data protection laws as a key differentiator to Amazon’s dominant service" . So perhaps you're right about the true purpose, but the article is c…
The game of telephone goes like-
* there's what I would guess to be reality * the things the article says, that distort from (what I would guess to be) reality * the things the headline says that distort from what the article says * the things most HN commenters who only read the headline say that distort yet further from the article and from reality
By reading some of the top HN comments, and then the article, I get to play this game backwards. This was a particularly good example.
I don't doubt that Lidl is building some platform for retailers and its supply chain to use. That's just good business.
And no doubt data protection plays some role in the strategy, though data protection is a right generally afforded individuals, and Lidl's focus will be commercial.
But these two paragraphs are particularly out of proportion:
Schwarz Group, which owns both Lidl and Kaufland, is launching its own rival to Amazon Web Services (AWS) following the recent acquisition of software specialist Camao IDC
and The acquisition, which completed on May 1, brings 70 cloud specialists into the wider group representing key “resources in an important area of digitalisation”.
AWS probably hired 70 people in a couple of hours yesterday, dwarfed by Amazon as a whole, which probably hired 5,000.