The sites look really good - I think they warrant $40-50/hr. You may want to consider offering multiple "packages" if you don't want to lose those clients. $3000/$40 = 75 hours... if you offer a package that's 25 or 50 hours, you can lower the price and maybe keep the client. That said, 1. You have to set expectations clearly - if they're not paying for a $3k website, they're not getting a $3k website. (most people w…
Yes, I'm not getting enough work, and 9 out of 10 people who contact me go elsewhere after hearing my prices, even though all of them love my designs. The problem with the whole "packages" is that I don't do that. Most people who come to me just want a new design and aren't concern about whether it takes me 10 hours or a hundred. Like-wise I quote a fixed price and not an hourly rate, most being in the $3000-$3500 ra…
If you don't want to call them "packages", that's fine -- but if you're giving fixed-price quotes of $3000-$3500 irrespective of the client when all they really want/need is 10-20 hours of your time you might be doing yourself a disservice.
By the same token, if your experience tells you that you really need the 75 hours to do a good job for a client, then don't sell yourself short.
Maybe you need to ask your clients to clarify what their expectations are in terms of hours and incorporate that into your quotes?
Maybe you need to clarify that you can be flexible with the overall price in exchange for less time (e.g. maybe do fewer revisions, simpler designs, whatever -- I'm not really a design expert).
Or maybe it's time to start billing by the hour? :)
Of course, you may hold yourself to a high standard and feel that you require that much time to do a "good job" by your clients. That's fine too, but understand that's a business decision that will leave you with fewer clients.
Just my two cents, but hope it provides some food for thought.