Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not at the $0 price point they don't.
I can see that happening at some point... as long as you host in Azure.
GitHub is now free for teams
421–430 of 664 posts
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#422Hi Nat, ICE kidnaps children and forces their captives to live in unsafe, inhumane, over-crowded conditions in the middle of a global pandemic. Why do you work with them?
Isn't that clearly better than just forcing ICE to install Gitlab?
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know what the Greeks would have thought about someone that doesn't care about politics? They'd think their best station in life would to be a slave.
but how does politics apply to such a boring tool like github? its like saying ICE shouldn't use Google Docs or Gimp... its not a weapon or an advantage in actual human cruelty that furthers non altruistic goals.
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#424Earlier quoted context omitted.
terrible question and off topic get political complaints out of here, github is a programming tool. doesn't matter if police use the same non lethal tools as normal citizens.
How far around your head do your political blinkers wrap? Would you be happy to write control programs for torture workstations?
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presumably ICE buys light bulbs. Should we also call out light bulb manufacturers and distributors for “working with ICE”? It’s not about politics for me, but rather the viewpoint that companies shouldn’t be the moral police of their customers.
I mean, I'm open to discussing whether we should or shouldn't, but I think it's not an off-topic discussion!
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#426Hi HN, I'm the CEO of GitHub. Everyone at GitHub is really excited about this announcement, and I'm happy to answer any questions. We've wanted to make this change for the last 18 months, but needed our Enterprise business to be big enough to enable the free use of GitHub by the rest of the world. I'm happy to say that it's grown dramatically in the last year, and so we're able to make GitHub free for teams that don'…
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#427Hi Nat, ICE kidnaps children and forces their captives to live in unsafe, inhumane, over-crowded conditions in the middle of a global pandemic. Why do you work with them?
This should be the overriding concern of everyone in this forum. It's no longer astonishing[0], but it is quite disgusting how HN participants are able to compartmentalize their enthusiasm for technology away from moral or ethical qualms. I suppose the most generous interpretation is to assume that they are simply unaware.[1] Upstream of that ignorance, however, is a fearful unwillingness to interrogate the foundatio…
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
How far around your head do your political blinkers wrap? Would you be happy to write control programs for torture workstations?
It's not really fair to compare selling tooling to a large agency that does a lot of different things with directly writing software that does something evil.
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#429Hi HN, I'm the CEO of GitHub. Everyone at GitHub is really excited about this announcement, and I'm happy to answer any questions. We've wanted to make this change for the last 18 months, but needed our Enterprise business to be big enough to enable the free use of GitHub by the rest of the world. I'm happy to say that it's grown dramatically in the last year, and so we're able to make GitHub free for teams that don'…
“Because nothing is truly free, we will be selling your data to pay for this new seemingly free service.”
If this is what you’re doing, if the privacy policy changes, I’ll be very disappointed.
How will this be funded? We’re customers actually against paying a small free to use the service?
Re: GitHub is now free for teams
#430Earlier quoted context omitted.
but how does politics apply to such a boring tool like github? its like saying ICE shouldn't use Google Docs or Gimp... its not a weapon or an advantage in actual human cruelty that furthers non altruistic goals.
That right they shouldn't because they engage human rights violations as a matter of policy.
sure it might be against Googles policy on a technically but are you seriously suggesting crime orgs care about the TOS included with their burner android phones?