Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The most expensive typefaces (2019)

medium.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 47 posts

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#31

Post by aasasd »

OzzyB wrote: post #6

I used to be on the side of fontographers before webfonts became a thing. Want to use a particular font for your print/screen production? Just pay for a license fee -- sure you might have to pay per weight, style, or even seat -- but at least you got to use it for your graphical productions as much as you wanted. Enter webfonts and instead of letting those same bought license "rollover" to the new medium they created…

> 0-50K monthly pageviews $price, 50k-100k another price

It's just a way to charge depending on the client's wallet. Standard practice in b2b, so let's be real: nothing new happened with web fonts in this regard.

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#32

Post by oh_sigh »

ElFitz wrote: post #29
oh_sigh wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't have an idea of how many users to expect, your server costs are an unknown too. I don't see how paying per view will change that.

Unless gp doesn't use any sort of auto scaling what so ever. In which case, the cost will be that of the (known) provisioned amount

The equivalent to that would be to just buy e.g. the 100k users font license, and then stop serving traffic once you hit 100k.

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#33

Post by enriquto »

lallysingh wrote: post #28
enriquto wrote: post #3

They are not that expensive. I would gladly pay a similar amount for a decent Baskerville LaTeX font with math support. I would have to hide it to my wife somehow, though...

https://tug.org/FontCatalogue/baskervillef/ ?

This is a good start (and baskervald is even better) but is not of excellent quality. I am not talking about the character shapes themselves, that are OK, but about the relationship with greek characters, with LaTeX math, and the quality of accented characters. What the world needs is an available version of the "SMF Baskerville" described by Yannis Haralambous here: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02101627

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#35

Post by wolfgke »

oh_sigh wrote: post #32
ElFitz wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless gp doesn't use any sort of auto scaling what so ever. In which case, the cost will be that of the (known) provisioned amount

The equivalent to that would be to just buy e.g. the 100k users font license, and then stop serving traffic once you hit 100k.

Even alone having to implement this (and perhaps become sued if there is a bug in the code) is a massive liability for the business.

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#36

Post by tptacek »

wolfgke wrote: post #35
oh_sigh wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The equivalent to that would be to just buy e.g. the 100k users font license, and then stop serving traffic once you hit 100k.

Even alone having to implement this (and perhaps become sued if there is a bug in the code) is a massive liability for the business.

And yet plenty of businesses use licensed fonts just fine, and, at the same time, literally nobody has to. What about this system is problematic?

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#37

Post by snazz »

OzzyB wrote: post #22
snazz wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get your point, but I don’t think Inter is similar enough to Circular to be a replacement for it. Inter is more of a San Francisco replacement in my book (which is how I use it on one of my websites—SF for Apple devices and Inter as a fallback). They’re both pretty, but Spotify’s UI looks very different than a UI set in Inter.

Tbh I was just reaching for a good "free font alternative" -- ofc they wont be exact clones -- but captures that "clean sans-serif design spirit" that seems to be all the rage at the moment.

Oh, okay. I misunderstood.

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#38

Post by briandear »

OzzyB wrote: post #13
tptacek wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure I understand the logic here. Webfonts are a thing now, which makes all kinds of fonts, both free and expensive, available for websites. How is that anything but a good thing? Of all the things that message board copyright activists get up-in-arms about, it's hard to imagine one where they have a weaker case than typefaces. Literally nobody needs an expensive typeface; we have more high-quality free typef…

The point is simply that if I wanted to create a website and use Circular [0] (a nice geometric font made popular by Spotify) I would need to pay based on total pageviews which is an unknown, so the price is unknown, which is prohibitive in the sense that I'm now tied to a font license that penalizes me based on the success of my website. Or, I could use Inter which is similar, free, better (more weights, filetype op…

>.. penalizes me based on the success of my website.

Just how I feel about taxes. “Progressive” taxation penalizes success.

Re: The most expensive typefaces (2019)

#40

Post by lallysingh »

enriquto wrote: post #33
lallysingh wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://tug.org/FontCatalogue/baskervillef/ ?

This is a good start (and baskervald is even better) but is not of excellent quality. I am not talking about the character shapes themselves, that are OK, but about the relationship with greek characters, with LaTeX math, and the quality of accented characters. What the world needs is an available version of the "SMF Baskerville" described by Yannis Haralambous here: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02101627

I wonder if people would chip in to pay someone to do it right.
Post reply on HN