Earlier quoted context omitted.
The administration turned away from the German designed/WHO standard tests everyone else is using, so I don’t think any international ones are FDA approved. Today’s presser sure gave me the impression that the delay in testing was so they could roll out this nebulous private-public partnership drive through testing and I guess boost CVS’ stock price or something.
> they could roll out this nebulous private-public partnership drive through testing Realistically, how would you envision tests on this scale being performed? In theory, it’s a great plan. Pretty much everyone in the US is close to a Walmart/CVS/Target. Drive up, get swabbed, check results online. Fast and minimal human interaction. The implementation remains to be seen but I can’t imagine the alternative of having…
South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
41–50 of 135 posts
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#42The situation in Stockholm, Sweden right now is: “You who have symptoms similar to coronavirus will not be tested in the future. This applies regardless of whether you have been in the areas that were previously exposed to infection or had close contact with someone you know is ill in covid-19.” There are no test kits. Hospitals have run out of face masks. And it’s only just getting started here.
Why?
Because it no longer matters, the containment effort for individual cases is now over. Now we move on to more mass actions to delay and slow the peak of the epidemic - anyone with symptoms to self isolate for a week, regardless of positive test.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#43The situation in Stockholm, Sweden right now is: “You who have symptoms similar to coronavirus will not be tested in the future. This applies regardless of whether you have been in the areas that were previously exposed to infection or had close contact with someone you know is ill in covid-19.” There are no test kits. Hospitals have run out of face masks. And it’s only just getting started here.
One could built UV-Lightmasks. A transparent hose, add UV-LEDS to sterilize the flowing air. Dry the air at the start with silica gel. All that is needed then is a battery. The silica gel can be heated every once in a while to loose any moisture bound it and sterilize virus particles attached to it.
At a glance they sell LEDs around 400nm which from my cursory reading wouldn't be effective for what you're imagining.
Not to say this would never work. Just that you would need special parts that are less common and more expensive by orders of magnitude.
I've also read that sterilizing very fast moving air doesn't work well. It seems HVAC systems use extremely intense light order to be effective in these conditions, which a small LED (or a few) wouldn't accomplish.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#44The situation in Stockholm, Sweden right now is: “You who have symptoms similar to coronavirus will not be tested in the future. This applies regardless of whether you have been in the areas that were previously exposed to infection or had close contact with someone you know is ill in covid-19.” There are no test kits. Hospitals have run out of face masks. And it’s only just getting started here.
Here in Denmark we have just shut our borders. You can no longer enter as Swede. We as nation put on extreme measures but there is no visibility. What is the true number of infected in Denmark? There is no sampling or systematic measurement going on. We probably know less than you guys in Sweden yet we choose the most extreme actions. We just had our PM go on national TV and call on all Danes to return to Denmark as…
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#45The questions to ask for any test: - What is the false positive rate? - What is the false negative rate? - Considering the above, what is the efficacy of mass testing? (Not saying it is or isn't effective, hard numbers are necessary)
Yup I have been wondering about this too. If my community has 10 beds and 2 docs what is anyone supposed to do if there are 100 positives? Other weird thought I had was how does security deal with some lunatic who gets tested positive and runs around infecting others...just walks into some critical hub like a hospital and pat's everyone on the back.
Isolate those 100 people. Then use whatever methodology[1] your society uses to allocated hospital beds to the ones that will get sick enough to need them.
Just because you test positive doesn't mean you'll need a hospital bed.
Oh, and while you're at it, ban public gatherings, and close schools. Because if 100 people tested positive, there's probably another 200-300 people walking around, infecting others.
[1] First-come-first-serve, youngest-and-healthiest-first, whomever-can-pay-more are the most popular methodologies for this.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#46The questions to ask for any test: - What is the false positive rate? - What is the false negative rate? - Considering the above, what is the efficacy of mass testing? (Not saying it is or isn't effective, hard numbers are necessary)
Yup I have been wondering about this too. If my community has 10 beds and 2 docs what is anyone supposed to do if there are 100 positives? Other weird thought I had was how does security deal with some lunatic who gets tested positive and runs around infecting others...just walks into some critical hub like a hospital and pat's everyone on the back.
It's happened. Criminal charges for assault probably work.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#47The situation in Stockholm, Sweden right now is: “You who have symptoms similar to coronavirus will not be tested in the future. This applies regardless of whether you have been in the areas that were previously exposed to infection or had close contact with someone you know is ill in covid-19.” There are no test kits. Hospitals have run out of face masks. And it’s only just getting started here.
One could built UV-Lightmasks. A transparent hose, add UV-LEDS to sterilize the flowing air. Dry the air at the start with silica gel. All that is needed then is a battery. The silica gel can be heated every once in a while to loose any moisture bound it and sterilize virus particles attached to it.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
With exponential growth of the disease, lack of testing, and poor healthcare infrastructure in the US, that would’ve happened anyway when people needed groceries. I guess they decided they might as well cash in on some testing stations.
You go in after hours when the risk of contact is minimal.
Also with the air-conditioner on exhaust and the people taking swaps without protective gear, or even with, moving the virus from car to car so efficiently.
Look at this crazy photo: first guy is leaning into the car with facemask down. Totally going to happen at half the Walmarts.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/03/12/upshot/12up-healt...
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
it wasn't "the market" that solved this problem. it was the employees, including the ceo, at that company who felt a duty to the rest of the country, not to some market opportunity, that effected the result. bureaucracies, including corporate ones (see: innovator's dilemma), are typically not nimble enough to respond to rapidly changing circumstances. it's not a market vs government (false) dichotomy.
I mean, the CEO and the employees are literally part of the free market.
That is something that “the market” often lacks in their relentless pursuit of shareholder value.
Re: South Korea's drive-through testing for coronavirus
#50https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/03/13/gettyimages-1205...
Europe (and likely USA)
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/03/12/upshot/12up-healt...
Leaning into the car with facemask down. Should end well.