Counterpoint: If you're looking for a life-changing outcome you probably shouldn't work on a hard startup until after you've already saved some money working somewhere else -- like at least spend two years somewhere stable so you can get approved for a mortgage. Investors in hard startups are often more like patrons who don't really understand the tech in which they are investing. They probably got their first taste…
Hard Startups
101–110 of 331 posts
Re: Hard Startups
#102This is an interesting perspective, but not one I found to be broadly shared by the dozens of VCs that I interacted with during fundraising. That we were doing a hard thing, despite having an experienced, capable, and "battle tested" founding team, as well as early revenue that was nothing to sneeze at, was very often a knock against us. Early on, it was kind of hard not to take this a bit personally, but that quickl…
Re: Hard Startups
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right. Which is why government research is probably a better model for these world-changing basic technologies than Silicon Valley. Ugh, can you imagine how bad TCP/IP would have sucked if it had been developed by venture capital funding?
which tcp/ip? There would be 10, all with incomplete feature sets and poor reliability.
Re: Hard Startups
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
HNCS (Hacker News Comment Section) is turning into AWZ (A WarZone) with these acronyms. Here are some definitions of acronyms: B2B: Business to business. SME: Small and Medium Enterprise? Subject Matter Expert? CRUD: Create Read Update Delete. B2SMB: Business to Small Business? CEO: Chief exec officer, SEO: search engine optimization, they have nothing to do with one another. VC: venture capital I'm not sure what SME…
Yes, SME is subject matter expert.
Re: Hard Startups
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like one of the hardest problems in tech is making search engine that credibly competes with Google. It's not just because the tech is hard (and it is), but also because they have some of the strongest network effects, user lock-in, and distribution deals. It sounds almost dumb/crazy for people to try, but there is a newer effort from Europe that I saw on HN recently (i.e. they've been working for ~5 years and…
"It sounds almost dumb/crazy for people to try..." Timely comment. I hesitantly shared a "Show HN" this morning for an early search engine I have been working on. I almost feel silly when I tell people about it because I realize it is such a crazy idea. It's obviously nowhere even close to being a competitor to anyone today, but I figure why not. I have been lucky with two prior highly vertical startups, so I decided…
Re: Hard Startups
#106"If you want to start a company working on a better way to build homes, gene editing, artificial general intelligence, a new education system, or carbon sequestration, you may actually be able to get it funded, even if you don’t have a degree or much experience." I encourage anyone to give hard startups a shot, but there are tons of PhDs/Postdocs out there who would make amazing founders -- they should make the leap!…
I'm currently in the research phase for an idea using algae/other plants that sequester CO2 rapidly and continue to have questions, which lead to more questions. Thankfully there is a ton of research that has been done, which makes diving into the topic easy. But having someone to work with that has a PhD/postdoc in this area could help build the idea faster. How can I meet someone with a PhD/postdoc in a specific fi…
Re: Hard Startups
#107I feel like the money quote was buried in the postscript. > Another solution to this problem is to think about startups that can become quite successful with less than ten people. As compensation packages from the giant tech companies continue to increase, I suspect this will become a trend. As cash comp at big public companies grow and the future value of startup options plummet, we need to start thinking about diff…
Is 2.5mm really viable for 10 people within SF Bay Area? That would mean compensation would be around $250k per person (not including payroll taxes, office rent, and whatever else cuts into that). That's distant from the compensation packages being given out by Big N.
I worked for a startup that got funded in that ballpark. There were seven of us. We sat at a couple folding tables at an incubator for six months or so, and used a vacant space (no power, no heat) to build and test our hardware. We eventually moved into a bigger incubator with more office and lab space, then our own office.
We weren't in SF. Location matters less every day, and you have to make sure the higher costs associated with various locations make sense. It's pretty amazing where you can find a machine shop that can make prototypes for you if you need it. Cloud service providers will give startups $10k/mo or so in free time to start with to get you hooked, so you need very little infrastructure.
It is possible to run for a while without a huge initial round if you've already confirmed there's a market, have built relationships with potential customers, and have a team who understands what they're getting into, and is motivated to delivering the first few milestones, whatever they are.
Re: Hard Startups
#108The most precious commodity is Opportunity: Market opportunity.
And, I know, human desires are endless. But, (legally) solvable problems are not endless, they're currently in very very short supply. this is why we end up with start ups like juicero. out of desperation, entrepreneurs are forced to take on problems that aren't really problems because all the real problems are blocked by legislation/legality/monopoly: education, housing, transportation, medical insurance.
Re: Hard Startups
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you maintain momentum at these kinds of time scales? When I ran engineering at a startup, I tried to structure things such that we deliver something worthwhile at some kind of predictable cadence. It's the best set-up for everyone: the employees feel like they've accomplished someting, the investors feel like there's progress being made. With software this is pretty easy to do (and even so, people often fail t…
That's a good question. My first thought was, "We didn't". But that's really just pessimistic memories speaking. My second thought was, "A perpetual state of stress and fear!". Also pessimistic memories, but closer to the truth. In reality, we had initial seed funding for about a year. We had a number of goals we had established, including vacuum chamber, getting the ion source running, first beam, first neutrons. We…
Re: Hard Startups
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you mind if we have a short chat about your sales approach? This is something I am still struggling with a little bit!
Same. :) Wish there was a venue/forum/platform to share tips and advice on this type of stuff!