Live data from Hacker News

US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

arstechnica.com

141–150 of 296 posts

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#141

Note: The following might be considered off-topic. On the otherhand, there might be something nefarious in the SMS network. I found something strange that affects SMS in Canada. You can send the lower case text "secure communication", but it will never be recieved by the recipient. I am not sure if this behavior is reproducible outside of Canada. It might be a software defect, or perhaps there is something capturing…

Just tried this in Ontario, networks were Bell (iPhone 7) + Koodo (Pixel 3) and it didn't deliver.

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#143
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the chinese can and do simply disappear people without the semblance of due process Hum you could use a chat with one or more guantanamo bay inmates

The scales here are extremely different. Millions of uighurs are being detained en masse for their race and religion. Guantanamo has 40 inmates who are related to national security. It's a false equivalence and disrespectful to uighurs to compare them to terrorists.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2019/nov/24/dont-lis...

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#144

Note: The following might be considered off-topic. On the otherhand, there might be something nefarious in the SMS network. I found something strange that affects SMS in Canada. You can send the lower case text "secure communication", but it will never be recieved by the recipient. I am not sure if this behavior is reproducible outside of Canada. It might be a software defect, or perhaps there is something capturing…

Just tried this in Ontario, networks were Bell (iPhone 7) + Koodo (Pixel 3) and it didn't deliver.

Thank you.

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#145

Note: The following might be considered off-topic. On the otherhand, there might be something nefarious in the SMS network. I found something strange that affects SMS in Canada. You can send the lower case text "secure communication", but it will never be recieved by the recipient. I am not sure if this behavior is reproducible outside of Canada. It might be a software defect, or perhaps there is something capturing…

I will update my records tomorrow morning with anyones accounts so long as they are confident the text went over SMS. It seems that not everyone can reproduce this issue, so that might help narrow down where the issue likely is.

Super busy now for a while...

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you American? If so, that is a false statement. DODI 5240.1-R says "[DoD components] Will not participate in or request any person or entity to undertake any activities that are forbidden by E.O. 12333 or this issuance." [1] The NSA, which has the SIGINT authority from EO 12333 [2], is a component of the DoD. A non-DoD entity, such as FBI, Treasury, etc, would (a) not have a foreign intelligence mission and would…

Snowden showed they were sharing nudes of ex-girlfriend in TAO. How well do you think the FISA warrant process is going in reality?

[flagged]

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#147
post #122

China's intelligence law requires people or companies to spy when asked. >“request relevant organs, organisations, and citizens provide necessary support, assistance, and cooperation”. According to Article 16, intelligence officials “may enter relevant restricted areas and venues; may learn from and question relevant institutions, organisations, and individuals; and may read or collect relevant files, materials or it…

Counterpoint: CALEA and National Security Letters in the US.

not to mention recent revelations about how the FBI is gaming and outright misleading in the FISA court process.

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The scales here are extremely different. Millions of uighurs are being detained en masse for their race and religion. Guantanamo has 40 inmates who are related to national security. It's a false equivalence and disrespectful to uighurs to compare them to terrorists.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2019/nov/24/dont-lis...

I have no idea whether I agree with your post, because I'm not going to bother to follow the links. If it's not worth your time to at least write a sentence introducing the links, then it's not worth my time to follow them.

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#149
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

as a US Resident, China has no authority to murder me or put me in a cage like the US Government does. So if I had to choose I would prefer china over the NSA, Of course neither is the best option but ..... if I lived in China the inverse would be true

In western countries you can, in general, publicly mock your leaders on the front steps of your legislature. Try dancing in a Winnie-the-Pooh costume in front of the Great Hall of the People and see what happens...

Your comment has nothing to do with what you replied to. It wasn't about what country is better.

Re: US says it can prove Huawei has backdoor access to mobile-phone networks

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Judging by the number of wars it started in the last century... it's definitely the American.

I don’t really understand comments like this. US has lots of problems but we do have the semblance of rule of law. We do have the notion of transparency and you do not get sent to a labor camp if you have political views antithetical to the state. The Chinese can and do simply disappear people without the semblance of due process. Their history also is one of ethnic cleansing as the Han people have pushed out or marg…

As a non-American, should I be more worried about a state that attacks its own people or one that has a demonstrated history of invading other countries and forced regime changes in those countries?

From a pragmatic perspective, I'd choose the former.

Post reply on HN