Earlier quoted context omitted.
> my own alarm has lessened considerably That that is the case speaks poorly of the WHO as a reliable source of information. Run the numbers. Run a regression on Hubei's spread. I did. That's the two-weeks out future for the virus outside of Hubei (unless the speculation that there was a secretive inoculation program in Hubei that went wrong). Presuming Hubei's population is normal, then this is spreading badly and i…
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." [...] Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
31–40 of 140 posts
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#32Just dropping a link here, anyone who is concerned about the coronavirus and has opinions about it should imo read the daily situation reports from the WHO: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2... In 5 minutes a day you will have a better informed perspective than what any news sites provide, my own alarm has lessened considerably after reading these.
> my own alarm has lessened considerably That that is the case speaks poorly of the WHO as a reliable source of information. Run the numbers. Run a regression on Hubei's spread. I did. That's the two-weeks out future for the virus outside of Hubei (unless the speculation that there was a secretive inoculation program in Hubei that went wrong). Presuming Hubei's population is normal, then this is spreading badly and i…
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#33> Two new hospitals, with 2,600 beds in total, were completed in 10 days , built by more than 2,000 migrant workers China.
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#34Sacrifice my ass. Their incompetence led to a province and its people being hung out to dry. They let this problem get out of hand—and now the people there suffer. How? They ignored the doctors who attempted to report the problem on New Year’s day. They (the CCP) take no precautionary measures until their political regime is threatened. So many things done wrong—including maintaining wet market controls up a few year…
Do not agree. Government everywhere makes mistakes under emergencies. Just look at past responses to hurricanes in the US and the current wildfire in Australia. Maybe you could say every government is incompetent. But the fact is that China reported the cases very early to WHO, get the genes mapped very quickly, and decisively locked down Hebei. So I would say so far China has shown competence and resolve, against a…
Literally every single comment on your profile is pro-CCP, anti-US.
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#35Just dropping a link here, anyone who is concerned about the coronavirus and has opinions about it should imo read the daily situation reports from the WHO: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2... In 5 minutes a day you will have a better informed perspective than what any news sites provide, my own alarm has lessened considerably after reading these.
> my own alarm has lessened considerably That that is the case speaks poorly of the WHO as a reliable source of information. Run the numbers. Run a regression on Hubei's spread. I did. That's the two-weeks out future for the virus outside of Hubei (unless the speculation that there was a secretive inoculation program in Hubei that went wrong). Presuming Hubei's population is normal, then this is spreading badly and i…
An argument backed by facts will help.
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#36Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
WHO clearly does not recommend travel bans. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on... : The Committee does not recommend any travel or trade restriction based on the current information available.
Which is yet another reason why nothing the WHO proclaims can possibly be taken seriously by any sane, rational, or informed person.
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#38Meanwhile, https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/408915/chin...
WHO clearly does not recommend travel bans. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on... : The Committee does not recommend any travel or trade restriction based on the current information available.
China also claims to have it under control (in the same reprimand) yet Coronavirus has snuck through their borders numerous times and is now in a dozen countries.
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#39Just dropping a link here, anyone who is concerned about the coronavirus and has opinions about it should imo read the daily situation reports from the WHO: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2... In 5 minutes a day you will have a better informed perspective than what any news sites provide, my own alarm has lessened considerably after reading these.
> my own alarm has lessened considerably That that is the case speaks poorly of the WHO as a reliable source of information. Run the numbers. Run a regression on Hubei's spread. I did. That's the two-weeks out future for the virus outside of Hubei (unless the speculation that there was a secretive inoculation program in Hubei that went wrong). Presuming Hubei's population is normal, then this is spreading badly and i…
Re: China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus
#40The amount of virulent (pun intended) hatred of the Chinese government really shows here. Can't say it's not well deserved but you can at least give them some credit for the quarantine.
You think that should be praised?