Are there any other projects using this setup? Also, any write up on the compelling reasons to switch? Are they hoping this move will attract more contributors? Article is unclear.
Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
21–30 of 258 posts
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#22Are there any other projects using this setup? Also, any write up on the compelling reasons to switch? Are they hoping this move will attract more contributors? Article is unclear.
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#23Are there any other projects using this setup? Also, any write up on the compelling reasons to switch? Are they hoping this move will attract more contributors? Article is unclear.
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you want mozco to go against the community's and project leaders decisions? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking or do I have to explain further?
Yes, if you are getting paid by someone you should do what they ask of you, especially when it's something sensible.
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you want mozco to go against the community's and project leaders decisions? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking or do I have to explain further?
Yes, if you are getting paid by someone you should do what they ask of you, especially when it's something sensible.
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#26Daily reminder that Rust uses Discord, a closed source piece of software with draconian privacy and data retention terms. Steve Klabnik will predictably reply to me saying that it was the decision of the community and blah blah, but the Mozilla Corporation should not have allowed it.
Baiting people like this is inherently uncivil.
> the Mozilla Corporation should not have allowed it.
Mozilla has no say over what the Rust community does.
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#27Are those clients ever going to be released to the general public ?
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#28I'm pleasantly surprised! They took the route of "promising but underdeveloped technology" rather than settling for a well-developed solution that compromises their principles (which, frankly, I wouldn't have faulted them for; at the end of the day you still have to get work done). With luck maybe we'll see Mozilla contribute to Matrix? There is, after all, an implementation written in Rust: https://github.com/ruma
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you want mozco to go against the community's and project leaders decisions? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking or do I have to explain further?
(Also, Rust isn't under MoCo, it's under MoFo directly.)
Re: Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, if you are getting paid by someone you should do what they ask of you, especially when it's something sensible.
So if I give you a dollar you'll stop commenting?
I could go my own way and comment for free (as I already do) and then I would be able to do whatever I wanted.
But as long as I am funded by you, yes I should do what you ask of me.