Nice, Intellij (avec GoPlugin) is the only dev tool I pay for out of pocket. The vast majority of the company I'm at uses VSCode (for mostly GoLang & Typescript). So I don't want to make the case to have them pay for it. But 40hrs/w of my existance is spent in a IDE/editor and IMO its totally worth it to pay for the one I feel most productive with.
JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
51–60 of 680 posts
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#52I love IntelliJ but I am constantly switching between PyCharm and WebStorm, which is quite annoying since I end up doing python and javascript in both. I wish they one modular product instead of many, many slightly different products. Edit: I'm learning in the comments below that IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate gives you the capabilities of the other products all together. This sounds great! I'm going to try it.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#53I love IntelliJ but I am constantly switching between PyCharm and WebStorm, which is quite annoying since I end up doing python and javascript in both. I wish they one modular product instead of many, many slightly different products. Edit: I'm learning in the comments below that IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate gives you the capabilities of the other products all together. This sounds great! I'm going to try it.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#54They also still give away their entire suite of products to students at no cost!
Several students tell me that it is only the full-version for free for a year, then it is subscription-based at a discount.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#55The single most feature I hate about their products is their reliance on JVM, which makes them memory hungry and slow on older machines. :)
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#56Jetbrains products are awesome though. I used to use a heavily customized vim which was a pretty good setup, but the things a jetbrains ide can do are just much better than what my custom setup could do. I pay for a personal subscription and couldn't be happier. I will recommend everyone to atleast give their products a try. They have a free trial period.
The community edition is Apache licensed, https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community it has no trial period, you own it forever.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
How great is the 32 GB of ram? I have a 2017 macbook pro. I don't ever develop on a desktop machine to be able to know what I'm missing out on by only having 16 GB.
I run on 16GB at work and 8 at home. At home I run into issues with large Factorio factories or if I have too many browser tabs open (tbh that's an issue with me, not with my system, but more RAM would be a workaround for it), but at work the amount feels quite luxurious. I never got close to running out even with multiple VMs running at the same time, so I don't really see the need for more than 16. Maybe specialize…
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#58I love IntelliJ but I am constantly switching between PyCharm and WebStorm, which is quite annoying since I end up doing python and javascript in both. I wish they one modular product instead of many, many slightly different products. Edit: I'm learning in the comments below that IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate gives you the capabilities of the other products all together. This sounds great! I'm going to try it.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#59I love IntelliJ but I am constantly switching between PyCharm and WebStorm, which is quite annoying since I end up doing python and javascript in both. I wish they one modular product instead of many, many slightly different products. Edit: I'm learning in the comments below that IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate gives you the capabilities of the other products all together. This sounds great! I'm going to try it.
Re: JetBrains: $270M revenue, 405K paying users, $0 raised
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
The new breed of garbage collectors may change this significantly for the better. They need to be explicitly enabled, but there is a GC (G1) that may be better suited for desktop applications (low latency pauses, relinquishes memory to the OS more frequently while idle, etc.) available in Java 11.
It's been the default GC since Java 9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage-first_collector
Unfortunately, the last time I used IntelliiJ it came with its own JDK8. Is that still the case, I wonder?