Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

bloomberg.com

181–190 of 251 posts

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#181

I'm one of the most staunch Apple supporters but even I must admit that since WWDC 2019, I have spent more time fighting Apple's bugs than actually using any of the new features...or the old features that used to work flawlessly (like iTunes/Music.) Not just on the user side, but the developer end as well. Perfectly valid code which used to work up till Xcode 11.1 throws errors inside the Swift runtime or toolchain o…

> And after seeing bugs I reported eons ago still not fixed, it feels futile to even bother reporting them anymore.

I've reported a number of bugs to WebKit over the years and it's the same thing, none have been fixed. You're lucky to even get an answer from someone in the WK team.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#182

I'm one of the most staunch Apple supporters but even I must admit that since WWDC 2019, I have spent more time fighting Apple's bugs than actually using any of the new features...or the old features that used to work flawlessly (like iTunes/Music.) Not just on the user side, but the developer end as well. Perfectly valid code which used to work up till Xcode 11.1 throws errors inside the Swift runtime or toolchain o…

Hate to break it to you but iTunes never worked flawlessly. It's always been a smoldering tire-fire.

It worked fine the last time I used it.... in Tiger.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#183
I don't use iOS much as I only have it on an iPad Pro, but Safari has this annoying thing where you tap a button or a link and nothing happens. The CSS changes so you know the tap event has occurred, but nothing happens. You have to tap again to navigate or submit a form.

Of course this happens on all iOS browsers since all are running on Safari web views.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#184
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like just about every software job I’ve had over the last 7 years. It sounds like a mgmt problem to me. Either they can’t tamp down the devs who move too fast and break things, or they are driving the devs to do so.

It's a lot harder to demonstrate how the value added by improving stability. Like, what's the difference between 99.93% availability and 99.95% availability? How do you show that increasing test coverage by 5% helps users and brings value to the company? "Hey, so you know how our application is pretty much always working, but will error out once every other blue moon? It does that less now," doesn't sound as flashy a…

> what's the difference between 99.93% availability and 99.95% availability?

Quite literally a 40% reduction in crashes

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why be a "staunch supporter" at all? Because they consistently make what I want to see. For example SwiftUI, which I had been waiting for my entire life. Call it the lesser evil, compared to my experience with other companies, if that's more acceptable for you. Here's a funny observation: I have 20+ upvotes on my previous comment criticizing Apple, but a negative score for the supportive statements on this one. So…

Likely because you can like a company, or portions of their output , without being a "staunch supporter", depending on your interpretation of what that even means. I think most people are interpreting being a staunch supporter with ignoring their shortcomings. You may not mean it that way, and may correctly criticize them for their missteps (it sounds like you do, since you reference criticism), but if people interpr…

> a "staunch supporter", depending on your interpretation of what that even means.

I just figured it was a nicer word to use than fanboy/fangirl.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why be a "staunch supporter" at all? Because they consistently make what I want to see. For example SwiftUI, which I had been waiting for my entire life. Call it the lesser evil, compared to my experience with other companies, if that's more acceptable for you. Here's a funny observation: I have 20+ upvotes on my previous comment criticizing Apple, but a negative score for the supportive statements on this one. So…

Perhaps broaden your horizons then, SwiftUI is a credible alternative to Flutter. Apple don't innovate, they build a better mousetrap. It has ever been thus.

Yes and everybody else has also stolen or borrowed some idea from someone else going all the way back to the first caveman.

Should we hinder people from appreciating Flutter either then, because I'm sure it too, did not really ""innovate.""

Everything is a copy of BASIC anyway, just without the line numbers.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#187
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ohhh yes, now you made me even more depressed. But at least the Switch OS has no oopsies (that I've seen.) :) My [New] 3DS has also been rock solid for years, hardware and software.

Horizon has a broken exFAT implementation that can corrupt SD cards. Normally it only affects people running homebrew, but it can also be triggered by eShop games (Pokemon Sw/Sh was in the news for this recently). Some would consider the lack of folders an oopsie but that's probably not what you're referring to. 3DS is indeed a damn solid device, though. Nintendo did really well with it.

Thanks for the heads up about Pokémon. Will start backing up my card more often (though I'm not if you can restore them by just copying the data to another card, didn't work the last time I tried it.)

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#188

There have been glaring bugs/issues lasting ages in both MacOS and iOS. For years apple mail on iOS would always show 1 unread message in "all mail" for gmail. On my iPhone 11 pro (and the 6S i had before it) the camera app will sometimes only show a black screen and a freaking reboot is needed to get it working again. I've missed out on many moments with my toddler because of that. Multi-monitor support was so good…

> I've missed out on many moments with my toddler because of that You just missed taking pictures. You were still there to live them :)

I don't remember any of the thousands of such moments I've had with my child (who is now a teen). Photos trigger such wonderful memories though.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#189

The same thing happened when we were working on Leopard under Bertrand. Because the developer toolchain switched to Objective C 2.0 with garbage collection enabled, the OS was unusable for development for months at a time. Development took twice as long as planned, the release was fairly bloated, and required 2 or 3 updates in the first month or two. When Craig took over he introduced a sprint model so that there wer…

Leopard was severely hamstrung by the fact that Scott Forstall abruptly "stole" all the leads from all of the various OS teams to work on the iPhone. Various projects went unfinished because they no longer had the bandwidth or knowledge to finish them. Likewise, Bertrand was super pissed about the failure in quality and Snow Leopard was the direct result of that.

Re: Apple’s iPhone Software Shakeup After Buggy iOS 13 Debut

#190
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Time machine's performance has slowly gotten worse and worse, leaving me having to cancel backups just so I can go home. you could try to increase the backup service‘s priority with ‚sudo sysctl debug.lowpri_throttle_enabled=0‘

That makes it suck slightly less, but TM can pretty much never be "fast" the way it works now, with the number of files we all have these days. In the best case, if a folder doesn't change, TM can hardlink to the previous backup of that folder. If even one file has changed, it has to copy the changed files and then hardlink every unchanged file in the folder, so TM chokes on any large folder where even a single file…

> a laptop that sleeps

Isn't "Power Nap" (in System Preferences » Energy Saver) supposed to help MacBooks do backup and other maintenance while they're sleeping and on AC?

Post reply on HN