Other than him being very outraged and claiming gender-based discrimination again and again, is there actually anything to suggest the algorithm is biased on the gender axis, as opposed to any other axis? Just to be clear: I am not dismissing the possibility that the algorithm (meaning the training data, really) is gender biased, it just isn't clear from what I have seen in the tweet storm that this is necessarily th…
No, but neither is there anything that would justify giving a spouse such a very different limit especially considering that they file joint tax returns and her credit score is better than his (see article). It would seem that his conclusion is warranted absent evidence to the contrary, the difference is too large to explain in ways that make any sense.
I think even if two people have their property in common (and if the algorithm even knows about that), it is still not unreasonable to believe that there is a higher probability of the one with higher income paying off his or her loans.