Live data from Hacker News

A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

law.yale.edu

21–30 of 87 posts

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#21
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the risk associated with a medical degree? It seemed to be the default path for risk averse middle class kids with science talent.

The risk of Medical and Law school is the enormous debt you take on. Those costs would have been about 4x times the value of my parents homes for example. If for some reason you don’t make it through Med or Law school, it’s not like they forgive the debt.

They also involve the most costly resource of all - time. Time that you can’t spend supporting your parents or siblings. Most people simply don’t have the option of deferring income for 8 years and 80 hour work weeks.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#22
post #6

My school and work experience span working class coal power plant techs (a friend used to climb through exhaust channels) to Ivy League educated lawyers and founders. Most people’s career trajectory will be set by the time they are in high school, so the importance of secondary school education and resources of your parents is paramount. Also, wealth from family of origin allows risk taking, funding for law or medica…

Going to Yale law is a very low risk strategy.

Only if you ignore the costs of getting into Yale (and failing to get into Yale), as well as the costs of not coming out with the necessary connections and pay.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#23

FWIW, the issue with life experience anecdotes is that they don't control for genetic confounding. Most rich kids have both the environment their parent created for them, as well as the genes their parents gave them. So it's impossible to tell which is more important in determining the life outcomes we see. There is a whole discipline called behavioral genetics that uses twin and adoption studies and, increasingly, g…

The genetic point could be controlled for by looking at the children of lottery winners.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#24
post #23

FWIW, the issue with life experience anecdotes is that they don't control for genetic confounding. Most rich kids have both the environment their parent created for them, as well as the genes their parents gave them. So it's impossible to tell which is more important in determining the life outcomes we see. There is a whole discipline called behavioral genetics that uses twin and adoption studies and, increasingly, g…

The genetic point could be controlled for by looking at the children of lottery winners.

maybe not. Probably lottery winners are addicted gamblers, have poor impulse control and so on.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#25
post #6

My school and work experience span working class coal power plant techs (a friend used to climb through exhaust channels) to Ivy League educated lawyers and founders. Most people’s career trajectory will be set by the time they are in high school, so the importance of secondary school education and resources of your parents is paramount. Also, wealth from family of origin allows risk taking, funding for law or medica…

I agree but I am not convinced wealth plays a big role. In France, higher education is pretty much free, and you see probably an even larger lack of social diversity than the US in the most ellitist programs (medecine, engineering, business). In the US there are always ways to finance education if you are a good student.

I think family culture, peer pressure and the school pushing you to go the hard path is by far the most important factor (for equivalent skills).

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#26
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The genetic point could be controlled for by looking at the children of lottery winners.

maybe not. Probably lottery winners are addicted gamblers, have poor impulse control and so on.

That's exactly the point. That should mean their children won't succeed if genetics rather than money are the most important factor. If their children do succeed then money was (probably) more important.

EDIT: If 'being good with money' is an issue, for example if lottery winners don't spend their winnings on their kids, then an alternative would be to look at the successes of children who are adopted in to wealthy families.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#27
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

maybe not. Probably lottery winners are addicted gamblers, have poor impulse control and so on.

That's exactly the point. That should mean their children won't succeed if genetics rather than money are the most important factor. If their children do succeed then money was (probably) more important. EDIT: If 'being good with money' is an issue, for example if lottery winners don't spend their winnings on their kids, then an alternative would be to look at the successes of children who are adopted in to wealthy f…

Hmmm. yeah, good point.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Going to Yale law is a very low risk strategy.

Only if you ignore the costs of getting into Yale (and failing to get into Yale), as well as the costs of not coming out with the necessary connections and pay.

The work you need to do to get into Yale has a positive impact even if you don’t go to Yale.

Re: A New Aristocracy: Yale Law School Commencement Address (2015) [pdf]

#30
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

maybe not. Probably lottery winners are addicted gamblers, have poor impulse control and so on.

That's exactly the point. That should mean their children won't succeed if genetics rather than money are the most important factor. If their children do succeed then money was (probably) more important. EDIT: If 'being good with money' is an issue, for example if lottery winners don't spend their winnings on their kids, then an alternative would be to look at the successes of children who are adopted in to wealthy f…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN