Live data from Hacker News

Tina is not a CMS

tinacms.org

51–58 of 58 posts

Re: Tina is not a CMS

#53
Myself and my colleagues have spent the last two months working on TinaCMS, and have learned a lot along the way. We believe Tina is a novel solution for managing website content.

For one thing, as the title of this post mentions, "Tina is not a CMS". Our team also works on the Forestry.io CMS, so we know how to build one of those. As we embarked on the Tina project, we felt that another one-size-fits-all CMS wasn't the solution we wanted. This is why we architected Tina as a suite of libraries to enable frontend devs to quickly compose a more form-fitting content management strategy for their clients.

Another interesting innovation that we discovered along the way was that, by having the CMS live on your website instead of in a traditional CMS dashboard, the correlation between source content and rendered website becomes much more intuitive to those who were not involved in developing the website to begin with. With a traditional CMS, users must have some mental model of how their site is composed. They can ultimately figure out that, for example, they can change the homepage title by clicking on Settings > Homepage > Title or something like that, but requires some trial and error and a lot of implicit rules to remember. With Tina, the editor will edit the Homepage title while viewing the homepage; the information will tend to be where they're expecting it. And by having a short-feedback, on-page experience, even more esoteric rules will reveal themselves more intuitively.

We have been thrilled so far with the response to the public release of this project. We hope to continue to improve and extend the capabilities of TinaCMS, and I'd like to thank everyone who has expressed their enthusiasm and support!

Re: Tina is not a CMS

#55
post #6

I'm currently using Netlify CMS on my Gatsby site for the blog bit. Any reason I should switch to this?

Tina is designed to give editors the live editing experience they want (similar to a site builder like squarespace) while developers maintain control over the project. NetlifyCMS is missing the former. They have their preview templates but it is not an exact representation and requires extra work from the developer. Tina is also designed so that you can create the editing experience that your customers/clients/cowork…

The 'requires extra work from the developer' would be the main way to improve on NetlifyCMS. You have to create a schema, and then translate the schema and any changes into an editor component. How does Tina do it without this?

Re: Tina is not a CMS

#58

I love static sites and made some using Hugo. A year later i've started working with WordPress and its ugly/nice (it depends) Gutenberg editor and to be honest, having a look at the quality (yes, there are a lot of excellent plugins and a lot of bad ones) and the availabilty of plugins,i think WordPress is the only platform to go for business oriented websites where seo, caching and other things matters a lot. I've b…

You could try Strattic (I'm the CEO) - it's a static site generator for WordPress. It's not a plugin, but rather a platform where we host the WP site and also generate the static output, which we then serve up via CDN. https://www.strattic.com.
Post reply on HN