It helps to know a little bit about what's been going on in Hong Kong, before you all decide to line up and take your daily dump on China. It all started a few months ago when someone committed a crime in Taiwan and fled to Hong Kong. To prevent HK from becoming a safe haven for criminals, the Chief Executive of HK proposed a new law to facilitate extradition of these crime suspects from HK to various jurisdictions i…
Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
161–170 of 931 posts
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's really not a matter of ideology, it's a matter of law. They either comply with Chinese law, or they risk their employees being arrested for breaking the law, or they stop doing business in China. I think they would argue that, given that all phones are subject to state surveillance, iPhone users in China are no worse off than if they were using another phone. Also since iPhones are generally a lot more secure th…
There's a fatal flaw to this approach though. The world is regressing into surveillance because quite frankly the mechanisms are already there and it's easy. What happens if someone in the US or the UK start using the justification of "well you did this in China so we'll legislate so you do that here" . Someone has to make a stand and the people running the apparatus purposed to make this possible are morally culpabl…
We can't outsource our responsibility as citizens of democracies to a corporation. Apple has done a heck of a lot more than most of us on HN in this fight, by standing up to unreasonable law enforcement requests for access to iPhone data, when the other phone companies rolled over. How much have you done on that front recently? A heck of a lot less than Apple, I'm willing to wager.
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#163As someone who has appreciated the privacy stance Apple has had and the privacy assisting steps it has taken for a long time (long before iPhone), I believe Apple is coming out to be completely hypocritical and anti-privacy/anti-freedom on this app. I cannot believe that Tim Cook and other senior executives haven't examined this deeper and taken a bold stance to let the app stay! Shame on you, Apple! Even John Gruber…
Apple only cares about privacy because it's a threat to Google and Facebook's business model. They don't care about privacy, they only care about "caring about privacy" when it is good for their business.
The chances that they keep up an app that people use to gain unwanted transparency into any state is exactly 0%
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#164Does this app signal where there's police activity? Yes Could it be used with intent to avoid police? Yes Does it mean that it's only used with criminal intent? I don't believe so. I personally use it to avoid protests and go through my daily life. Should you now remove Safari because it allows you to access data that would potentially help with criminal intent? What about the twitter app, lot's of messages related t…
> Should you now remove Safari because it allows you to access data that would potentially help with criminal intent? Worked for gab.
It would have really tested the supposedly pro free speech stance of that site.
I mean I'm being a bit tongue in cheek there but I'm really not sure if censorship doesn't further radicalize those people by letting them rally around a "Us against Them" mentality. Wouldn't interacting with those people be better?
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's really not a matter of ideology, it's a matter of law. They either comply with Chinese law, or they risk their employees being arrested for breaking the law, or they stop doing business in China. I think they would argue that, given that all phones are subject to state surveillance, iPhone users in China are no worse off than if they were using another phone. Also since iPhones are generally a lot more secure th…
Wasn't it "the law" also when they came up with the privacy claim around that terrorist case where the FBI needed access to a device? I mean, in the end it's the same thing as the classic "I didn't do anything wrong, I've been following orders".
In that case Apple successfully fought the FBI demand, within the law. Had the law required them to render assistance I'm sure they would have done so, otherwise they would have been requiring their employees to break the law.
Under what circumstances do you think it is acceptable for a company to require it's employees to incriminate themselves?
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#166Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#167This is a good reason to never buy apple. You never know when you might need to install an app banned by your government. At least on Android you can install apps from unofficial sources.
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a fatal flaw to this approach though. The world is regressing into surveillance because quite frankly the mechanisms are already there and it's easy. What happens if someone in the US or the UK start using the justification of "well you did this in China so we'll legislate so you do that here" . Someone has to make a stand and the people running the apparatus purposed to make this possible are morally culpabl…
Apple don't run the apparatus in China, they refused to do so. iCloud services in China are run by a Chinese company. We can't outsource our responsibility as citizens of democracies to a corporation. Apple has done a heck of a lot more than most of us on HN in this fight, by standing up to unreasonable law enforcement requests for access to iPhone data, when the other phone companies rolled over. How much have you d…
Let's skip the whataboutism in these threads. That solves nothing. Incidentally I do a lot more than most people do on this matter.
Re: Apple Removes HKmap.live from the App Store
#169As someone who has appreciated the privacy stance Apple has had and the privacy assisting steps it has taken for a long time (long before iPhone), I believe Apple is coming out to be completely hypocritical and anti-privacy/anti-freedom on this app. I cannot believe that Tim Cook and other senior executives haven't examined this deeper and taken a bold stance to let the app stay! Shame on you, Apple! Even John Gruber…
Apple only cares about privacy because it's a threat to Google and Facebook's business model. They don't care about privacy, they only care about "caring about privacy" when it is good for their business.