Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But I do know that knowingly and actively hurting people "because society does it too" when you could trivially avoid it is reprehensible My argument isn't "do it because society does it too", it's we already have systems in place to give people the therapeutic treatment they need to get past issues like this, which are issues, because it is unfeasible to expect society to shape itself around coddling that person's…
> it is unfeasible to expect society to shape itself around coddling that person's beliefs What indication do you have that a majority of the "society" in question (Stack Overflow) has a problem with addressing people in the manner they prefer? In other words, have you considered the possibility that you are the one with an opinion or belief that runs contrary to what this "society" expects of its members? If so, are…
An Update to Our Community and an Apology
391–400 of 424 posts
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trans individuals and other marginalized people often spend a lot of time online as a kind of safe haven from difficult personal circumstances. People online can be horrible asshats to a degree they wouldn't dare be in person. These two facts tend to collide and go bad places. (This comment is only describing the problem space, not taking sides in an argument.)
As other comments here already described, the gender of the person writing questions or answers on SO shouldn't matter at all. If you really want to avoid all issues with this, just randomize usernames for every topic and mandate gender neutral language. There is no need to use gendered pronouns in the Q/A format.
In a military report, the enemy isn’t ever referred to as “they” because that pronoun could also be understood to refer to another friendly unit or allied government force depending on ambiguous word order or mistranslation. Instead a term like OPFOR or similar is used consistently instead of a pronoun.
This is what sites like SE should use as a standard: precise and pronoun-free language for both questions and answers.
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#393Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not a both sides issue. The medical fields moved to complete affirmation of trans identities a while ago because the scientific evidence for trans affirmation is overwhelming -- literally everything from mental health outcomes to surgery regret rates indicates that. The other side is both bigoted and factually wrong .
This is exactly my point. The other side looks at you and says you're wrong with equal conviction and their own bevy of justifications. Since you and the other side can't mutually agree on some set of axioms of worldview, both sides' "facts" just become opinions.
For example: one group believes in evolution, another believes God created the Earth out of nothing 6000 years ago. Without a time machine, neither one can categorically prove exactly what happened. But one side has mountains of evidence, and the other has dogma and ideology.
There's a lot we don't understand yet about how being trans works, just as there's plenty of gaps in the fossil record that we haven't been able to fill yet. But if you ignore all the evidence we do have in favor of cherry-picking only the isolated studies that might support your position, you're no better than the people who think that the scarcity of transitional fossils refutes evolution.
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not a both sides issue. The medical fields moved to complete affirmation of trans identities a while ago because the scientific evidence for trans affirmation is overwhelming -- literally everything from mental health outcomes to surgery regret rates indicates that. The other side is both bigoted and factually wrong .
literally none of it does. what you just said is factually wrong. trans is a mental disorder and never stopped being that. some far-left activists are trying to say its not but that doesnt change the science. calling everyone a "bigot" doesnt change anything either other than show people that you arent reasonable and put feelings over facts
You're allowed to believe whatever you want. Science doesn't care about your feelings. Cherry-picking only the studies that can be interpreted to support your opinion, while ignoring the balance of the research that disagrees, makes you no better than the people who insist that archaeological evidence supports young Earth creationism.
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
literally none of it does. what you just said is factually wrong. trans is a mental disorder and never stopped being that. some far-left activists are trying to say its not but that doesnt change the science. calling everyone a "bigot" doesnt change anything either other than show people that you arent reasonable and put feelings over facts
Most of the medical community disagrees with you. You're allowed to believe whatever you want. Science doesn't care about your feelings. Cherry-picking only the studies that can be interpreted to support your opinion, while ignoring the balance of the research that disagrees, makes you no better than the people who insist that archaeological evidence supports young Earth creationism.
gender identity is accepted as different from sex and because males and females are different so its possible that some people may have gender dysphoria (which is literally a mental disorder like body dysmorphia). nobody disagrees with all that.
but 100 different genders and non-binary is not accepted by science. believing in that is like believing in creationism and flat earth at the same time.
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#396>Last week we made an important decision for our community. We removed a moderator for repeatedly violating our existing Code of Conduct and being unwilling to accept our CM’s repeated requests to change their behavior. Hang on a sec... >their behaviour. Wasn't monica fired for suggesting she used gender neutral pronouns generally? Because they said she should use the preferred gender specific pronoun when known? And…
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why the hell are pronouns a centerpiece of a CoC? Just be nice to people. For fuck's sake.
Because life isn't that simple. To one group "misgendering" people is harassment and therefore not nice. To another group being forced to speak as if someone is a gender you do not believe them to be is patronizing and not nice. No one is intentionally being unkind, other than the people who like to wade into the culture war
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why the hell are pronouns a centerpiece of a CoC? Just be nice to people. For fuck's sake.
> Why the hell are pronouns a centerpiece of a CoC? Because aggressive misgendering including by refusal to use the subject’s preferred pronouns is currently a significant form of harassment which is actively promoted by certain groups. > Just be nice to people. The fact that people aggressively refuse to do that is exactly what pronoun policies are responding to.
if you want to make extreme choices then youre gonna have to accept that its not going to be as comfortable. nobody owes you anything
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm gonna wade in hip-deep here and suggest that, given the size of the transgender community, the heat and hype of these issues are completely unwarranted. No hate towards anyone and I'll call anyone whatever they want as far as pronouns. But why is this a top-3 culture war issue? For a bunch of combatants who are overwhelmingly not trans and shouldn't really care? We need to think of a way to rise above without thr…
Honestly it is very strange to me that this is being downvoted. The level of outrage that I see is not at all proportional to the number of people affected. This is a very strange phenomenon. I seriously feel that the most heated carriers of torches in this scenario are people who gravitate towards "power play" moments and have happily found a niche where they can be ruthless in their assault.
you see so many people who do this then get eaten by the same group when they inevitably screw up some rule in the future
Re: An Update to Our Community and an Apology
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly it is very strange to me that this is being downvoted. The level of outrage that I see is not at all proportional to the number of people affected. This is a very strange phenomenon. I seriously feel that the most heated carriers of torches in this scenario are people who gravitate towards "power play" moments and have happily found a niche where they can be ruthless in their assault.
> The level of outrage that I see is not at all proportional to the number of people affected If you insist on calling a transman “she” because of his genitals at birth, then (aside from how to affects me because I have trans people I care about, which is, to be sure, the more important impact on me), it also means when you call me “he” it only coincidentally aligns with my preference rather than respecting it. Just…