They'd need two batteries in a drone to do that of course, or perhaps some other robot could execute the battery swap.
Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
61–70 of 83 posts
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#6236 battery changes later...
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#63The real takeaway is the radical increase in the abilities of flying drones, and the raw potential they leave to be harnessed by future engineers and entrepreneurs. Those who discount their usefulness by staying within the context of the video, and not elaborating outside of that, aren't getting it. I would refer you especially to @burgerbrain's comment and the videos he posted. Specifically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvRTALJp8DM
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#64I'm going to be a pedant here - that does not look like a swarm, and they don't claim it is (in the video, at least). By "swarm" I would understand that all have the same programming and that the assembly process is emergent from simpler instructions plus exploration and feedback. Instead they appear to be programmed to act sequentially with a pre-planned set of actions. There is no feedback, no emergence. In short,…
This appears to be a "multi-body" problem (rather than a "multi-agent") problem: that is, there is likely one primary decision-maker which dictates the construction task ordering, likely computed via a partial-order multi-body planner. That's part 1 of the AI.
But there's another part that's equally interesting. The multi-body planner produces a series of construction steps. Each step is ordered with regard to certain steps, unordered with regard to other steps (these can be done in any order but not simultaneously), and explicitly declared parallel with yet other steps (they can be done simultaneously). The quad-roters grab the steps and perform them in parallel when possible, and at least form a queue otherwise. Last, the quad-rotors have to perform these steps without hitting one another, so there's a significant real-time multi-body path-planning problem involved.
Multi-body planning, scheduling, and plan monitoring is nontrivial and should not be so lightly dismissed.
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#65Great fun, but I suspect NIMBY concerns would kill any practical application. Let's imagine they get the machines scaled to the point when they could build an actual habitable structure, and that they sort the power concerns that I suspect would make it insurmountably uneconomic. Now, imagine a squad of sufficiently large and powerful helicopters buzzing away all day next to your office . How many people are going to…
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#66There are many complex processes being performed at construction sites. Many steps take highly optimized machines to perform robotically but that a single human can do just by changing tools.
Because of these processes, automating the entire construction process would be very expensive to do right at the site.
All parts would have be modularized so they could be snapped together. Or robots will have to be able to change tools. Or parts will have to be moved from robot to robot, with as much work being done before parts are actually brought to the site.
Either way, it will be interesting to see how it works out.
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#67I'm going to be a pedant here - that does not look like a swarm, and they don't claim it is (in the video, at least). By "swarm" I would understand that all have the same programming and that the assembly process is emergent from simpler instructions plus exploration and feedback. Instead they appear to be programmed to act sequentially with a pre-planned set of actions. There is no feedback, no emergence. In short,…
Correct about the swarm -- indeed it's not a multiagent problem -- but perhaps a bit unfair regarding the "dumb machine" part. This appears to be a "multi-body" problem (rather than a "multi-agent") problem: that is, there is likely one primary decision-maker which dictates the construction task ordering, likely computed via a partial-order multi-body planner. That's part 1 of the AI. But there's another part that's…
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#68Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#6936 battery changes later...
http://translogic.aolautos.com/2011/01/06/ces-2011-gm-brings...
Re: Watch a swarm of flying robotic drones construct a tiny building
#70Great fun, but I suspect NIMBY concerns would kill any practical application. Let's imagine they get the machines scaled to the point when they could build an actual habitable structure, and that they sort the power concerns that I suspect would make it insurmountably uneconomic. Now, imagine a squad of sufficiently large and powerful helicopters buzzing away all day next to your office . How many people are going to…
So, human workers and ordinary, loud construction equipment buzzing away all day for 2 years is ok, but robot equipment - quite capable of working 24/7 and likely capable of going faster - buzzing away for 8 months, thats unacceptable? I think unions are gonna scream louder than any NIMBY concerns.
I relatively regularly have the local police helicopter overhead and it's definitely loud enough to keep people awake, sometimes to wake you up in the first place. A whole fleet of these withing 1/4 mile of you will be loud, noticeably louder than a usual construction crew, and I'm still concerned about the neighbours complaining about the risk of this fleet of robot helicopters crashing into each other or dropping parts. Really, I think this is a very cool tech but a mad application of it that I really can't ever see working.