How does the end user know if WARP is actually working? As I understand it, a regular VPN will mask your IP so you can tell very easily if you’re protected by checking your externally reported IP. How would you know with WARP?
WARP is here
211–220 of 386 posts
Re: WARP is here
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't lots of smaller hosting providers have DDoS protection? Did you try one of those and find it wasn't good enough?
No, can you link me to some of these "smaller hosting providers [that] have DDoS protection"? In fact, I can't find any matching that description.
Re: WARP is here
#213It's borderline unusable for me. It takes 20 seconds for every YouTube video to load while they load instantaneous without WARP: https://streamable.com/9tp1k
Re: WARP is here
#214I'd really like to use this on my computer. The article says it uses the WireGuard protocol, can I just take the private key from my device, put it in a configuration file and use it?
They've said elsewhere[1] that they're are working on desktop apps. No time frame yet. If you can extract the endpoints, private and public keys, it might work. It would be considered unsupported and might be considered a violation of the terms of use. Check the license agreement. 1: https://community.cloudflare.com/t/warp-desktop/79072
That answer is correct, but official word is here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21071258
Re: WARP is here
#215I'm confused about who sees what IP when. I'm also confused about the bandwidth limits on plus. Having essentially two products blended together, and using new technology that behaves uniquely, makes the communication lift here that much heavier.
The IP discovery is currently only available for CF websites: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21070828
Re: WARP is here
#216Exciting! We're a tiny company and have sponsored WireGuard two years in a row; you can see us on the WireGuard home page. Cloudflare is a gigantic company who just used the WireGuard design work to fork the project. Has Cloudflare given a cent to WireGuard? Why isn't their logo on the site?
What/how can we do more to encourage corporate sponsorship (either time or money) of code that's critical to a company? There are various ways the community has tried to enable this, in different ways. Librapay and platforms like it try to make it easier (Think Patreon but less commercial). The Linux Foundation takes large corporate donations and distributes it out to a large number of projects they support. Stick a paypal email address or bitcoin address in the Readme.md as a "serverless" way to receive money.
However at the end of the day, that seems to not work. Curl is used in billions of devices but the majority of the work on it has been done by one person for 20 years.
Something is not working as we hoped.
†) specifically Open Source under the GPLv2 license ‡) https://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects/
Re: WARP is here
#217Still, it's quite exciting that Cloudflare's finally released Warp, and that the waitlist for Warp was so long.
Re: WARP is here
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's clearly stretching the laws of physics, at the very least This is not clear to me. Few mobile users have pings to anywhere pushing up against the speed of light, and the bandwidth/loss/routing is not close to being limited by physics.
No, he's correct here, it's an extra indirection and so overall it can only hurt performance, not improve it. For example, ISPs often have caching servers from Google installed and Google is the biggest traffic generator. If you route traffic through somewhere else you are going to reach different Google's caching servers that are farther away and over more congested links.
Re: WARP is here
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, he's correct here, it's an extra indirection and so overall it can only hurt performance, not improve it. For example, ISPs often have caching servers from Google installed and Google is the biggest traffic generator. If you route traffic through somewhere else you are going to reach different Google's caching servers that are farther away and over more congested links.
> No, he's correct here, it's an extra indirection and so overall it can only hurt performance, not improve it. Really? The cost of an extra hop is just one of tens (hundreds?) of factors that would determine if using WARP would be faster for a particular scenario.