Live data from Hacker News

Pi-Hole 4.3.2

pi-hole.net

161–170 of 224 posts

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#161
post #53

Openwrt has DNS ad-blocking built in which works just as well as pi-hole. It simply doesn't have the monitoring of what is being blocked but it is rarely needed anyway. https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/ad-blocking

If your router hardware is sufficient enough, OpenWRT supports QEMU, so you can run Pi-Hole in that:

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/virtualization/qemu_host

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#162
post #49

I already have uBlock Origin on Firefox, with tracking protection set to strict and I don't really remember seeing ads on desktop. I guess the main benefit of the PiHole is to have ad blocking on mobile devices, iPads... and others, do you think this is worth the effort of setting up in your experience?

Yes. I have local adblockers running (umatrix in Firefox, ublock origin in Chrome), plus Pihole.

Currently using ublock origin and thinking of adding the pihole (party cause it just seems like a fun weekend project). Anyone have experience with how often maintenance needs to be done and/or settings need to be tweaked on the pihole? Hoping for something I won't have to fiddle with more than every couple months once it's set up.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could instead WireGuard split tunnel dns traffic and serve it with Pi-Hole or forward it to dns.aguard.com if you do not really require analytics or use unbound with block lists to resolve names recursively.

Have you managed to get WireGuard to do split tunnel DNS? I've been wanting to do this, but couldn't figure out how to make it work on Android, for example.

Since wireguard uses allowed-ips for making routing decisions, it has been straightforward to set one up.

The gist is, on the client configuration:

1. Set DNS server IP against allowed IP in the peer (which is your wireguard server) section.

2. Set DNS entry to the same IP as above for the client interface.

Ref the discussion and the linked blog post (that talks abt Pi-Hole with wireguard): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19544532, https://www.reddit.com/r/WireGuard/comments/bqccdz/split_tun...

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#165

The one thing that's holding me back on actually using Pi-Hole is the lack of flexibility. What I'd really like to see is the ability to do various things on a per-client basis. For example, one commenter wanted a simple "reload without blocking" functionality and the response was to use a bookmarklet plus the Pi-Hole API to disable it temporarily. This works, but the problem is that it disables it temporarily for ev…

Hi there, one of the Pi-hole Devs here. This is something we are very much looking into. Take a look at this PR[1] for more details!

No ETAs as yet, of course, but it's something that has been asked about time and time again, and we think we may just have solved it...

[1] https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2935

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#166
post #62
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can see a screenshot from my VPN pihole blocking tracking requests from my android phone and make a decision do you need it or not. https://i.imgur.com/Hpcw42h.png

Damn, that's amazing.. can't believe 76% of requests are unnecessary. Assuming you're running this on a RPi at home, do you have DynDNS or how are you managing the external IP?

I have similar numbers. 90% of the blocked requests I see come from 3 apps that are particularly diligent about submitting metrics. 2 phones have outlook installed and boy does outlook hate when metrics fails! Those phones alone account for half of the DNS requests in a network with about 15 devices, despite being out of the house for 9 hours every day.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Spin up a different pi-hole vm per user

How would you handle routing those packets to the correct vm based on the user?

Keep an eye on this PR for future functionality...

https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2935

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you’re into fun experiments, you can also try putting a few pennies into a jar whenever you visit a website or write a script to simply block the sites you need to visit.

"But what about my business model? Don't you know I have an inalienable right to it?"

How is that any different from someone thinking they have an inalienable right to any article/website they want?

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#170
post #139

My pi-hole is blocking 20% of all queries. Can we say that 20% of end-users internet traffic is for tracking and advertising ?

This 20% queries could be 50% (or whatever) of your traffic. It depends what is being downloaded, would the queries be successful. You could measure the website you‘re visiting with/without the pihole.
Post reply on HN