The one thing that's holding me back on actually using Pi-Hole is the lack of flexibility. What I'd really like to see is the ability to do various things on a per-client basis. For example, one commenter wanted a simple "reload without blocking" functionality and the response was to use a bookmarklet plus the Pi-Hole API to disable it temporarily. This works, but the problem is that it disables it temporarily for ev…
Pi-Hole 4.3.2
61–70 of 224 posts
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#62I already have uBlock Origin on Firefox, with tracking protection set to strict and I don't really remember seeing ads on desktop. I guess the main benefit of the PiHole is to have ad blocking on mobile devices, iPads... and others, do you think this is worth the effort of setting up in your experience?
You can see a screenshot from my VPN pihole blocking tracking requests from my android phone and make a decision do you need it or not. https://i.imgur.com/Hpcw42h.png
Assuming you're running this on a RPi at home, do you have DynDNS or how are you managing the external IP?
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#63I already have uBlock Origin on Firefox, with tracking protection set to strict and I don't really remember seeing ads on desktop. I guess the main benefit of the PiHole is to have ad blocking on mobile devices, iPads... and others, do you think this is worth the effort of setting up in your experience?
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#64I have Pi Hole running on my LAN and it's amazing. Also helped me identify that my Amcrest PoE security cameras aggressively phone home, even when no cloud functionality is configured on them. All the reason to keep them on their own VLAN and off the Internet.
Separate VLANs is the right answer. Phoning home is not an Amcrest-specific thing, all of my cameras (I have a handful of Amcrest and D-Link cameras, and one Reolink camera) try to do that. I've put them all in a separate VLAN which can't access anything, not even DNS. The NVR software lives on a different VLAN and is able to open connections to the cameras for recording. This setup works perfectly. Most importantly,…
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#65Not quite clear what they are replacing easylist with? Like I get depreciating stuff but this seems like it’s still very much in active use? No plan B/transition?
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#66The one thing that's holding me back on actually using Pi-Hole is the lack of flexibility. What I'd really like to see is the ability to do various things on a per-client basis. For example, one commenter wanted a simple "reload without blocking" functionality and the response was to use a bookmarklet plus the Pi-Hole API to disable it temporarily. This works, but the problem is that it disables it temporarily for ev…
The other is for me, and my personal devices have been manually set to use it as their DNS. It filters a lot more aggressively as I am more willing to put up with broken stuff for more privacy (eg completely blocking all FB domains, lots of Google stuff, etc). It also means I can suspend mine for a bit if I need to and not have the kids bombarded with ads.
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#67I've had my Pi-Hole for a month now. It's great, but many blocklists are bad. People often use https://firebog.net/ to get their blocklists, and use only those with a checkmark which are, quote, "least likely to interfere with browsing". Bollocks, I've had to disable a few of the recommended ones, and adding manual whitelisted hosts because they were blocking legitimate sites (ocsp.apple.com), blocking Windows update…
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has an API. > You can craft a URL that disables pi-hole for X minutes, using the API. You hit the boomark and boom, pi-hole temporarily disabled. If you save it to your phone's home-screen, you've got an instant disable button.
What I'd really like is temporary whitelisting a single domain. Just because I need to use site X for a couple of minutes it doesn't mean I want the flood-gates open.
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#69The one thing that's holding me back on actually using Pi-Hole is the lack of flexibility. What I'd really like to see is the ability to do various things on a per-client basis. For example, one commenter wanted a simple "reload without blocking" functionality and the response was to use a bookmarklet plus the Pi-Hole API to disable it temporarily. This works, but the problem is that it disables it temporarily for ev…
Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2
#70I already have uBlock Origin on Firefox, with tracking protection set to strict and I don't really remember seeing ads on desktop. I guess the main benefit of the PiHole is to have ad blocking on mobile devices, iPads... and others, do you think this is worth the effort of setting up in your experience?