Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

austinmann.com

151–160 of 294 posts

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#151
post #4

The photography in these kinds of reviews is amazing, and the camera looks pretty stellar compared to the XS, but I find myself reading them wondering if it will make my pictures any better. I'm a mediocre photographer at best, and I'm certainly not going to be able to capture many images like the ones in this review.

Then this review might be more up your alley :D https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/iphone-1...

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#152
post #15

Just wondering how much this is really just software performing the "upgrade"? The Pixel 3 camera app made every camera better in the end.

The new iPhone camera looks pretty sweet but the part that I'm starting to disagree with is what they call, "semantic rendering." This is where the camera recognizes different things in the photo and treats them different like sharpening some areas, smoothing others, etc.

To me this this aspect feels like basically an Instagram filter. Are we going for accuracy or how pleasing the photos are? They're definitely more pleasing but not an accurate representation.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#154
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure what you mean. I understand it to be a review by a professional photographer - but one with an obvious bias towards Apple, as they have been a client of his, he uses their phone's cameras in his work, and he has a book about how to take pictures with their phones. But that does not make it an advertisement, as far as I know, he is not paid by Apple, nor did Apple provide the phone or control what he said…

How did he get hands on a phone that hasn’t been released yet if Apple didn’t provide it?

Maybe he found it in a bar?

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did he get hands on a phone that hasn’t been released yet if Apple didn’t provide it?

That's fair, it may be a provided phone. But then that puts him in a similar situation as any site that has a review for the phone now. You know his relationship with the phone itself and Apple. Consider his review with that perspective - but I still think it's a valid review .

And now if he doesn't write a glorious review then he won't be ever contacted by Apple again in the future. Really hard to trust objectivity of his review in these circumstances.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#156

How could anyone read this without knowing it's an advertisement: "today I’m just as thrilled to be putting an entirely new Ultra Wide lens in my pocket. It gives us another format to tell the story, another perspective to visualize, and a better rounded tool for doing our best creative work."

It's not even meant to be subtle. Everybody knows how it works. You receive some gadget form a manufacturer, you present it in a positive way, you can keep it and expect more to come. If you break the rules, you won't receive the next one. There is no incentive to break the rules on either side.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#157
post #4

The photography in these kinds of reviews is amazing, and the camera looks pretty stellar compared to the XS, but I find myself reading them wondering if it will make my pictures any better. I'm a mediocre photographer at best, and I'm certainly not going to be able to capture many images like the ones in this review.

Many peoples' photos can be improved by 1) trying to be more still while the HDR photos are being captured, 2) resist the urge to zoom, 3) tap on the area of the photo you want to be in focus before shooting, and 4) generally stick with landscape mode.

This is especially true when taking a picture of someone in front of a mountain (or something similar). Don't zoom! Take a picture of the mountains with the people in view, not a close up picture of the people with a sliver of mountain in the background.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#158
post #4

The photography in these kinds of reviews is amazing, and the camera looks pretty stellar compared to the XS, but I find myself reading them wondering if it will make my pictures any better. I'm a mediocre photographer at best, and I'm certainly not going to be able to capture many images like the ones in this review.

So I want to throw out something quickly - just because someone claims a photo has been shot on an iPhone doesn't mean that they shot it in the same way as you or I would. Lots of people have special lenses that they attach in front of the iPhone camera lens to get a macro / wide angle view. They almost always shoot RAW with an app that supports this. They also use a mini tripod to stabilize the photo and use techniques like long exposure.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEH38ZxUYAQDPBT?format=jpg&name=...

There's also a lot of editing skill that goes into this - a photographer won't simply take whatever processing the phone comes up with use it out of the box.

I personally use the lightroom mobile camera to capture RAW photos and play around a bit with curves, exposure, hsl etc. to get the look I want. I assume if they're a pro photographer, they move the RAW photo to the PC / iPad and add some photoshop magic as well.

The output (depends on the photographer ofcourse but for the ones I like) looks very natural and doesn't have the same look as simply applying an instagram filter on top of an iPhone camera shot image.

Obviously the composition etc., that folks are talking about matter a lot as well but IMO, these days camera hardware is so good that you can get all sorts of detail out of what you assumed was a blown out camera RAW. Crops work fairly well too because of how high-res the photos are, so if you're not too pleased with your initial composition, crop + photoshop fixes will get you a long way. As a whole, photography these days is about 70% editing and 30% photo taking technique (lighting, composition, aperture, shutter speed, iso etc.)

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#159

How could anyone read this without knowing it's an advertisement: "today I’m just as thrilled to be putting an entirely new Ultra Wide lens in my pocket. It gives us another format to tell the story, another perspective to visualize, and a better rounded tool for doing our best creative work."

It's in that zone where the limit between native content and advertisement becomes blurry. Where do you draw the line where an advertorial [1] starts? Or native advertising [2]? This type of content is likely to become more common, too. With the rise of ad-blockers, companies are putting more weight on alternative methods.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertorial

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_advertising

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#160

How much better is the Pro camera than regular iPhone 11 camera?

Cameras and chips are identical, however the Pro gives you the Telephoto lens. (That’s the “third” lens on Pro.)

Does the telephoto help at all with photos unless it's for zooming in and out?
Post reply on HN