Live data from Hacker News

Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

forbes.com

161–170 of 368 posts

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#161
post #37

Kudos to the team. While my current workspace is tied to GitHub, I will most certainly switch to Gitlab given the option to. Why? Only one reason: GitHub support is fucking horrible. It’s insanely bad, even for paying enterprise customers. Open a support ticket, you will get some superficial pointers to documentation, and then be completely ignored. Their Product team is the absolute worst too. There are so many thin…

I can totally relate to that. In flood of notifications I missed information about expiring CC. Instead of somehow soft-locking the account they just downgraded it and all my integrations, hooks and god knows what just blowed. I managed to fix the CC in 5 minutes, but many months after I am still recovering from that disaster. Support replied that they did send warning so I should just FO.

Oh that's odd. We've been running into CC issues on our team and we were "disabled". So we had no access to our production repos but AFAIK nothing was downgraded.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#162
post #37

Kudos to the team. While my current workspace is tied to GitHub, I will most certainly switch to Gitlab given the option to. Why? Only one reason: GitHub support is fucking horrible. It’s insanely bad, even for paying enterprise customers. Open a support ticket, you will get some superficial pointers to documentation, and then be completely ignored. Their Product team is the absolute worst too. There are so many thin…

> There are so many things that can make life easier for users (better configurability for CODEOWNERS notification?)

Can you please elaborate on this? What type of configurability are you looking for? What other things do you think would make life easier for users? Please feel free to email me!

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#163
post #87
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. Do you have any insight into MSFT's strategy for GitHub? I assume it helps make it seem developer friendly, data-mining, identifying projects/new ideas of value and validation, and is part of their becoming more of a cloud company strategy.

> Do you have any insight into MSFT's strategy for GitHub? Between LinkedIn and GitHub they probably have the best data for identifying great devs/engineers as well as encouraging future devs to use their products. Soft power.

This is very interesting, as means of finding talent before its larger competitors do. The discussion about how Google has a “deep bench” to deal with shifting and departures seems to apply here conceptually.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#164
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can self-host behind an enterprise firewall and get all the benefits of open-source software model within the company without exposing proprietary software projects to the whole world.

There's GitHub Enterprise if one wants to self host.

True but being able to test it a bit on a small team is a big help. Migration from CE to EE is relatively easy and demonstrating CE to management helps a lot.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Search friendliness. Quite a few open-source projects rely heavily on being findable, and often use their Github README as a sort of "marketing site" for developers. Finding projects organically on Gitlab is a nightmare.

Search in general in Gitlab is painful. Searches seem to require 3 or more characters, but if you put two you just don't see any results. No warning saying add more. Pretty intuitive. The file name search is pretty rapid though.

Github search is not much better.

I've resorted to using google search and append site:github.com to my query.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#167

I don't see how it's worth that much unless their plan is to strip all features from gitlab community or expect a Google acquisition.

Oh it'll get acquired eventually, the question is when, and at what price, and by whom? How valuable is a Github competitor if nobody's leaving Github to use it? I don't see Google being interested; they know it won't make any money but from corporate users, and corporate users don't take Google Cloud seriously. Someone like Atlassian might be interested if they didn't already have 5 CI/CD solutions.

I'd submit most of the bigger players could (and probably have) simply build their own comparable versioning system for cheaper.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#168

Does anyone know why GitLab hasn't taken off so much amongst open source projects? I have no horse in the race (indeed, I'd love for there to be more variety in this space) but one of my jobs is to link to open source repos and I've just checked.. and the last one I linked to was in December 2018. In the niches I cover, almost no-one seems to actually using GitLab for their open source repos. Lest you think it's just…

On-premise hosting. This is so important to organizations that can't use internet hosted services, for all sorts of various reasons.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#169

At my last job Gitlab was in the stack and I had never used it before so I was expecting it to be a real pain. It was actually a perfectly pleasant experience. I don't think it'll make me leave Github but I put them at the same level now. Merge Requests never felt right saying over Pull Requests, even though it's more descriptive of what's actually happening.

I'm being pedantic here, but the reason I prefer pull is because it feels more general than a "merge," which to me precludes a fetch/rebase. I guess you could consider it a merge -ff-only, but in a mergeless-master workflow, "merge request" felt awkward.

Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO

#170
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not currently using Gitlab anymore, but in the past, it was their CI that won me over. I was always felt left wanting more though because there wasn't a true sense of community/explore. If there's one thing I value most about Github today it's the ability to easily discover new projects and human beings; and Github helps tremendously with that whereas Gitlab I feel like you end up fighting the system to discover…

You make Github sound like a social network. A good one, I mean.

Back when social networks were the new hip thing in startup land and dev tools were not, GitHub ran the tagline "Social Coding".
Post reply on HN