Live data from Hacker News

India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

wsj.com

271–280 of 297 posts

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Non-linguists tend to grossly underestimate the number of languages and diversity in regions of the earth. True, but old-school linguists tend to revel in this diversity, whereas more modern linguists try to find commonalities between these very diverse languages. I remember auditing a linguistics class in college largely because I was interested in NLP. Sadly, I got the old-school professors who were more interest…

Since I'm trained as a new linguist, not the old school you're referring to, I feel compelled to reply in order to correct some potential misunderstandings here. Structurally, you could also just take the position of Pollard & Sage (1994), for which they were so heavily criticized, and assume that every language on earth has the deep structure of English. By purely structural criteria many languages that historically…

> As to your personal experience: That's sad, you merely seem to have ended up in the wrong department / with the wrong professors.

It was a while ago (graduated in 2005), but I think linguistics was under the English or anthropology department (I do remember the building was in the liberal sciences area). While I saw a clear connection between linguistics and NLP, I got the sense that the focus was to understand culture through language, and less about understanding language and communication itself.

> It's worth giving it another try!

I'd like to, but in the ~15 years since I've graduated it feels like the entire computational linguistics field has grown so dramatically that many of the problems I was originally interested in have been more-or-less developed (e.g., segmenting words into their phonemes for machine learning models, building grammar trees). Today, I'm more likely to grab one of the many libraries that do all this magic under the hood while I remain ignorant.

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#272

Latest update... looks like they've found the location of the lander on the lunar surface, the orbiter has clicked a thermal image of the lander, and they're trying to establish a contact with it. Don't know how reliable this source is: https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1170610654232731648

Edit: This is a fake account. My apologies. From the ISRO Chief himself: https://twitter.com/KailasavadivooS/status/11706129755828879...

> https://twitter.com/KailasavadivooS/status/11706129755828879...

It's a fake account :)

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#273
post #10
post #7

It's a good effort by ISRO and it's scientist. Just can't understand why so many countries reinventing the wheels. Space missions should be multi-country efforts continuously as it belongs to all. We should not extend our tribal nationalistic thinking to space. Best scientist can be in any nation and more diverse the group and experience the better chances of success. I know I am just dreaming, but hopefully we can c…

No. We’re different groups of people with different interests, different values, different ideas principles cultures histories views of the world. It’s good for us to be competing to explore space (and in trying to develop technological advantages in general). For countries like India it’s critical to develop their own technologies on this front. Otherwise they’ll remain eternally dependent on America, etc., for acce…

Sounds tribalistic but ok.

Just because you can't imagine an alternative to the status quo doesn't mean it's impossible.

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#274
post #71
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well let's revisit this statement in 500 years. Every decade has brought the world closer. Even the recent developments (brexit, trump) are reactions to increased pace of integration. You can find kfc, coca cola in socities as diverse as Mongolia and Madagascar. It will be extremely difficult to turn the clock back on this and this will only keep on intensifying in my opinion.

> Every decade has brought the world closer. Well, (1) there are more sovereign nations now than ever, (2) all the big empires (from Babylonian, to Alexander's, to Roman, to Byzantium, to Persian, to Incas, all the way to the Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, British and French colonial empires, USSR, and more) -aside from the Chinese and Indian who are more homogenous racially/culturally - have collapsed (3) there is way m…

> (1) there are more sovereign nations now than ever,

Yeah, but the power of the nation state has also weakened. Try subtracting many of the EU member nations as individual sovereign countries for instance, or look to the outsized influence of multinationals.

2. The West is essentially one large empire.

> (3) there is way more infighting that on any time in the previous 40 years

Source? 40 years is a bad timescale - bring that up to a few hundred or thousand and we are at an almost all-time low.

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Edit: This is a fake account. My apologies. From the ISRO Chief himself: https://twitter.com/KailasavadivooS/status/11706129755828879...

> https://twitter.com/KailasavadivooS/status/11706129755828879... It's a fake account :)

Thanks for pointing it out!

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> IMO leaders should let scientists focus in crunch time. What do you mean "focus"? The landing mission was not controlled by the scientists at all. The mission was taken over by the lander and was automated. The lander chose the landing spot and the trajectory. The scientists could do nothing but just monitor the data coming in. Modi being there or not being there would not have changed the outcome. So stop this can…

Please stop calling anyone who doesn't agree with you "left" brigade and "anti national". It insults everyone's intelligence. You don't know me or my political views. You know my opinion on this issue, let's stick to debating that. Modi's presence sure wouldn't make the lander land better. What if there are key decisions that need to be taken in some missions, in an emergency, would you want politicians looking over…

> Modi's presence sure wouldn't make the lander land better. What if there are key decisions that need to be taken in some missions, in an emergency, would you want politicians looking over their shoulder ? Modi could have gone a day later and given a raucous congratulatory speech or a motivating speech.

There are no key decisions as there is no realtime communication. As simple as that. There is a huge delay between when the signal is emitted from the lander and the time it takes to reach the ground station. That process cannot be sped up, emergency or not. Instead of all this whataboutery why not just take some time and read up on the actual facts? What is this nonsense about politicians looking over their shoulder? Modi is a respected man in ISRO. And this isn't the first time Modi visited ISTRAC during a launch or an important mission. Nor is he the first Prime Minister to do so. Manmohan Singh also visited ISRO during important launch missions. Heck the entire Department comes under the Prime Minister. So I don't see what all this fuss is about unless it is a hatred for Modi which has no cure! And are Scientists going to be affected by the presence of the Prime Minister and not the entire Leftist International press (Specifically BBC, New York Times, Washington Post and the other usual leftist outlets) that has written nothing but garbage about Indian Space Program and how it is not worth it when India has to still tackle poverty? Isn't that greater pressure than the presence of the PM who has nothing but been supportive of ISRO whether it be success or failure? If I were an ISRO scientist I would be more worried about leftist Western Media breathing down my neck hoping against hope that we screw up so they can write more articles about how India lacks toilets and basic infrastructure and post images of slums rather than be worried about a Prime Minister who has never been bad to me in any shape or form. A PM who got many scientific projects that were stuck in limbo for over a decade in an endless loop of official approvals out so I could work on them. I would be scared of this supportive PM and not the negative press? Really?

If I were you, I would have called for removal of the leftist International Press that dared to insult ISRO and its Scientists and still gets an opportunity to sit in ISTRAC and watch the entire Mission. But nope. Target the Prime Minister because all he did was to go and give some encouragement. He is a softer target because he is used to taking insults all the time. And you know who insulted ISRO scientists after the launch? It was a journalist from a leftist news organization called NDTV: Pallava Bagla [1]. Is this the way to behave with a Scientist? Modi had to go back again to console the Scientists and the Chairman who was in tears [2]. Absolutely shameless and disgusting.

> Please stop calling anyone who doesn't agree with you "left" brigade and "anti national". It insults everyone's intelligence. You don't know me or my political views. You know my opinion on this issue, let's stick to debating that.

Because you are insulting everyones intelligence here by stating that Modi's presence will somehow affect Scientists working on the Mission. Mine is more saner, realistic and grounded in facts compared to yours. And yes you belong to the leftist brigade. There is now no doubt about that. The more and more you try to argue your non-existent point the more evident it becomes. That is how all frustrated leftists behave. Somehow try to stick their own fallacious assumptions on Modi and hope it will stick. It is a vicious spiral. Once you start hating someone you try finding everything that can justify that hatred. Even if that something is extremely irrational. Imagine if the person sitting there wasn't Modi and it was someone else you like. Would that have changed the outcome of the Mission? Nope. Would the Scientists have felt any pressure? Nope. There you have your answer.

[1] https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/journalist-draws-flak-for-h...

[2] https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/isro-chief-k-s...

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So, a question for you - do you have any scientific basis for your views, or are they based on an idea of how the world should be? The average nucleotide diversity (pi) for the 50 segments is only 0.061% +/- 0.010% among Asians and 0.064% +/- 0.011% among Europeans but almost twice as high (0.115% +/- 0.016%) among Africans. The African diversity estimate is even higher than that between Africans and Eurasians (0.0…

Is there more genetic diversity in wolves, or in individual breeds of domesticated dogs? I would assume wolves. Does that mean that there are no dog breeds? For that matter, you seem to be conceding the point that there are different groups of people similar to those commonly referred to as "races" that have discernibly different traits - in this case nucleotide diversity. In other words, I do not think that your pap…

The other poster is speaking from the large consensus among biologists whereas you are speaking from/citing...?

Should I just presume you to be correct on race unless proven wrong?

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#278
post #152

Latest update.. DSN did a carrier lock on lander https://twitter.com/dsn_status/status/1170391223040954368 DSS 54 carrier lock on Chandrayaan-2 Lander Frequency: 2.2846GHz Signal strength: -143dBm IDLE OFF 1 TURBO

ISRO located the lander and got a thermal image from the orbiter

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/chandrayaan-2-isro...

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>And plenty of countries manage incredible amounts of diversity. India has 50 official languages on its own, and that’s ignoring dialects and weird subgroups. Indo-Aryan is spoken by ~74% of India, with Dravidian spoken by ~24% of India. So in practice the real-life language diversity is very small. As for 'managing diversity', India has historically 'solved' this through a caste system, not a solution I would propos…

Are you saying that every speaker of an Indo-Aryan language can understand every other speaker of an Indo-Aryan language?

I don’t believe that for the Dravidian languages mutual intelligibility is common. I’m a Tamil speaker and I can’t understand any Telugu or Kannada - it sounds like people speaking Tamil underwater in a dream.

Re: India Loses Contact with Probe Just as It Prepares to Land on Moon

#280
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Integration is such an interesting term. Before we got to see what the internet actually became, it was a realm of endless idealism. It was going to be something that would finally unite people across cultures and any sort of boundaries. People would be able to share ideas, communicate instantly, and effectively turn humanity from a disparate group of people separated by arbitrary lines into simple a group of diverse…

"Check out the mid 1200s. The Mongols created a single unified empire than stretched from western europe to eastern asia." The main problem with this argument and others statements similar to it is that we don't have objective evidence for the state of the world in 1200. The information from before cheap printing is heavily biased, mostly hearsay from few individual sources that had their own agenda.

There is extensive evidence beyond even just writings including death records, genetic records (1 in 200 men, around the world, are direct descendants of Genghis Khan), and much more. And when you reach such a tremendous scale there is just an unimaginable amount of writing from people of all different views and values.

The argument you're making is sufficient to discount and any all records of history. And indeed not even history of the long past, but also the present. Do you know exactly what happened in Syria from falsifiable objective accounts, or are you relying on information spread by a small number of sources each with their own agenda?

I think your argument definitely deserves consideration when you get into the minutia of history, but when you're talking about the big scale (this empire ruled this land at this time) I think your argument is more about a disbelief in everything, historical nihilism, rather than justifiable incredulity.

Post reply on HN