Live data from Hacker News

Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

sourcehut.org

41–50 of 219 posts

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#41
They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS?

There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#42

When you register, you notice that: > Notice: sr.ht is currently in alpha, and the quality of the service reflects that. As such, payment is currently optional, and only encouraged for users who want to support the ongoing development of the site. Caveat emptor.

For more details on what the alpha entails, see also:

https://sourcehut.org/alpha-details/

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#43
post #41

They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.

There’s not even any analytics or trackers. The shame!

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#46
post #41

They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.

Monthly operational costs: $783

Maybe there is a relation?

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#47
post #41

They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.

Monthly operational costs: $783 Maybe there is a relation?

Are you going to say there is not even a distributed no-SQL cluster behind this? Well, I can understand the UI part, but there are limits...

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#48
post #43
post #41

They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.

There’s not even any analytics or trackers. The shame!

And no non-standard fonts on some random CDN.

My eyes are bleeding

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#49
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Monthly operational costs: $783 Maybe there is a relation?

Are you going to say there is not even a distributed no-SQL cluster behind this? Well, I can understand the UI part, but there are limits...

Local config for static stuff and postgres yes-SQL.

I assume it doesn't scale extremely easily but seems to work good enough for now.

Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees

#50
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The competitor is leaving the market, which hardly makes them a competitor at all. Any users who don't want to be left out in the cold need tools like this.

Then why not make the tool open source + standalone and compatible with other alternatives like GitHub/GitLab/Gitea/Gogs/etc. so the users can pick the competitor or tool they like?

Why are you stating that the tool is not open source? Did you even check that?
Post reply on HN