There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.
Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
41–50 of 219 posts
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#42When you register, you notice that: > Notice: sr.ht is currently in alpha, and the quality of the service reflects that. As such, payment is currently optional, and only encouraged for users who want to support the ongoing development of the site. Caveat emptor.
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#43They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#44Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#45How was this upvoted so often without a single comment?
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#46They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.
Maybe there is a relation?
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#47They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.
Monthly operational costs: $783 Maybe there is a relation?
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#48They violently break all the recent frontend best practices. Where is the React or Vie, SPA architecture, tons of JS? There should be a federal law prohibiting making fast and simple UIs so that nobody will have concerns that the UI frameworks war leads us to great future.
There’s not even any analytics or trackers. The shame!
My eyes are bleeding
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Monthly operational costs: $783 Maybe there is a relation?
Are you going to say there is not even a distributed no-SQL cluster behind this? Well, I can understand the UI part, but there are limits...
I assume it doesn't scale extremely easily but seems to work good enough for now.
Re: Sourcehut welcomes Bitbucket refugees
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
The competitor is leaving the market, which hardly makes them a competitor at all. Any users who don't want to be left out in the cold need tools like this.
Then why not make the tool open source + standalone and compatible with other alternatives like GitHub/GitLab/Gitea/Gogs/etc. so the users can pick the competitor or tool they like?