Live data from Hacker News

Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

pubs.rsna.org

201–210 of 233 posts

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#201

Many people seem to believe that vaping is harmless, this is good to make the point clearly that vaping, while not as harmful as smoking cigarettes, isn't a "cost free" activity. I personally didn't realize that it could have these effects either.

My main concern with the way things are going is that it looks an awful lot like attacks on vaping are for the purpose of driving smokers back to cigarettes. I know of no one that things vaping is harmless. It is certainly much, much less harmful than cigarettes and is infinitely preferable to cigarettes. I quit smoking, with the help of vaping. I was a pack-a-day Newport smoker that started on a ludicrously high 36m…

Same. Those cigarettes are ugly to quit from.

Currently tapering on a vape.

After just two weeks, the improvement in overall body function was amazing. Benefits continued on for months after that.

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does that mean that caffeine is a risk too? Doesn't it have similar effects to nicotine? (I drink a loooooot of coffee).

Really disappointed there’s no comments here. I scrolled this whole thread to see if anyone had talked about coffee. It got me thinking because I know someone who never drank coffee in their life and lived a pretty full life nonetheless otherwise ... they’re over 100 as of recently and still self mobile, super active, sharp as a tack. She even had quite a few children. I consume like 4-5 actual brewed coffees per day…

Doomed to a slightly shorter life, made richer by the enjoyment of a beverage.

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#205
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems clear that e-cigs are better than smoking. It also seems clear that e-cig manufacturers are hoping to hook young non-smokers to expand their market. Both are valuable bits of info, but "e-cigs do confirmed damage" is extremely important info from a public health perspective.

> It also seems clear that e-cig manufacturers are hoping to hook young non-smokers to expand their market. This is mentioned a lot, but I find it questionable. I’ve never seen an ad that made me feel like Joe Camel or the Marlboro Man did when I was a kid. My teenagers haven’t ever thought vaping was cool based on ads or plenty of people doing it. This sounds too much like a general truism of capitalist enterprise—a…

They absolutely intend to stay in business. I have that from a chance, frank conversation with someone high enough in that industry to know.

Let's be honest. It is great money. People do not give that up. It gets taken from them.

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been a long-time smoker, and at least for me, nicotine alone does absolutely nothing to alleviate cravings. Gum, patches, lozenges, vaping, etc. do zero to alleviate my craving for a cigarette. I'm not discounting that nicotine is addictive (I'm in no position to say), but there's got to be something else in tobacco that is part of the addiction.

Have you ever tried Swedish Snus? It's supposedly healthier than smoking, and no need to spit like chewing tobacco. If you try it. make sure you get fresh stuff before you pass judgment, because it ferments inside the package if left out for too long.

That’s how you get mouth cancer.

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#207
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can test this yourself. Test your blood pressure prior to vaping and then after. If you choose to ignore all else you could argue the rise in BP is transient and not concerning. I personally would not bet my life on it.

Jogging in place will also transiently raise your blood pressure.

But it then over time it lowers your resting blood pressure. Not sure nicotine would since most users constantly use it (and it may not with occasional use either, I'm not sure).

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#208
post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you ever tried Swedish Snus? It's supposedly healthier than smoking, and no need to spit like chewing tobacco. If you try it. make sure you get fresh stuff before you pass judgment, because it ferments inside the package if left out for too long.

That’s how you get mouth cancer.

It's still considered the safest form of tobacco out there, and the increased risk of mouth cancer is quite small to non existent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/30/business/studying-snus-a-...

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#209
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's an information imbalance so definitive claims can't be made about cannabis smoking in the way that they can be made about Tobacco smoking.

Imsuspect marijuana smoking is just as harmful. The bulk of the trouble from tobacco is from the smoke. And if you look at the health effects of air pollution, they’re very similar to smoking: respiratory infections, heart disease, COPD, stroke and lung cancer Inhaling any burning thing is quite bad for the human organism. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_pollution#Health_effects

I don't know any people who smoke 20-40 joints a day

Re: Acute Effects of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation on Vascular Function

#210
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is evidence that some additives enhance addiction and that others suppress the side effects from smoking (coughing, burnt throat, feeling ill, etc.) so that when someone quits smoking they have essentially stopped treating themselves for all these side effects, which then appear and make the person feel miserable. Smoking instantly relieves symptoms again (for a while): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles…

>So it appears that although nicotine is mildly addictive It's not mildly addictive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance_dependence#Dependenc...

Nicotine is not on that list.
Post reply on HN